↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN553-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:22:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SYN553-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:00:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS derived 221 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 90 clauses.
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS allocated 63410 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 12 :
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.45  1[0:Inp] ||  -> p2(u,u)*.
% 0.21/0.45  5[0:Inp] ||  -> p2(f8(u,v),f8(v,u))*.
% 0.21/0.45  6[0:Inp] || p2(u,v)* p2(v,w)* -> p2(u,w)*.
% 0.21/0.45  7[0:Inp] ||  -> p2(f8(u,f8(v,w)),f8(f8(u,v),w))*r.
% 0.21/0.45  8[0:Inp] || p2(u,v) p2(w,x) -> p2(f8(w,u),f8(x,v))*.
% 0.21/0.45  9[0:Inp] || p2(f8(f8(f9(c4),c4),f9(c3)),f8(f9(c4),f8(f9(c3),c4)))*l -> .
% 0.21/0.45  12[0:OCh:6.1,6.0,7.0,5.0] ||  -> p2(f8(u,f8(v,w)),f8(w,f8(u,v)))*.
% 0.21/0.45  15[0:OCh:6.1,6.0,12.0,12.0] ||  -> p2(f8(u,f8(v,w)),f8(v,f8(w,u)))*.
% 0.21/0.45  21[0:OCh:6.1,6.0,15.0,5.0] ||  -> p2(f8(f8(u,v),w),f8(u,f8(v,w)))*l.
% 0.21/0.45  35[0:NCh:6.2,6.0,21.0,9.0] || p2(f8(f9(c4),f8(c4,f9(c3))),f8(f9(c4),f8(f9(c3),c4)))*r -> .
% 0.21/0.45  228[0:Res:8.2,35.0] || p2(f8(c4,f9(c3)),f8(f9(c3),c4))*r p2(f9(c4),f9(c4)) -> .
% 0.21/0.45  231[0:MRR:228.0,228.1,5.0,1.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : p2_1 p2_5 p2_6 p2_7 p2_8 not_p2_9
% 0.21/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------