%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SYN559-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:12:27 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN559-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 03:25:40 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.37 # % 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 14 Number of unprocessed: 14 % 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 14 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 14 conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 14 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 6 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.37 # 14 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 8 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 6 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (p8(c13,c9))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (p7(c10,c13))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(c9,c13),c14))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, negated_conjecture, (p2(f5(c14,c10),c15))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(f4(c11),c12),c15))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, negated_conjecture, (p2(f4(X1),f4(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_23, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X2)|~p8(X3,X4)|~p2(X3,X1)|~p2(X4,X2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_24, negated_conjecture, (p7(X1,X2)|~p7(X3,X4)|~p2(X3,X1)|~p2(X4,X2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (p2(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (~p7(c10,X1)|~p8(X1,c9)|~p2(f5(X2,c10),f3(f4(c11),c12))|~p2(f6(c9,X1),X2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(X1,X2),f3(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 8 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(X12,X13),f3(X12,X13))|~p2(X13,X13)|~p2(X12,X12)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~p2(X13,X13)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~p2(X12,X12)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (p2(f3(X12,X13),f3(X12,X13))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_25])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (~p2(X14,X14)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (p2(f3(X14,f3(X12,X13)),f3(X14,f3(X12,X13)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (~p2(X6,X6)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_15])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (p2(f5(X6,f3(X14,f3(X12,X13))),f5(X6,f3(X14,f3(X12,X13))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_68, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # Child (5660) has found a proof. % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Proof search is over... % 0.13/0.37 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------