%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:58 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 1.46s 1.60s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.46s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.02/0.08 % Problem : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.02/0.08 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 18:42:38 EDT 2024 % 0.08/0.27 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.43 start to proof:theBenchmark % 1.46/1.60 %------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.60 % File :CSE---1.7 % 1.46/1.60 % Problem :theBenchmark % 1.46/1.60 % Transform :cnf % 1.46/1.60 % Format :tptp:raw % 1.46/1.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 % Result :Theorem 1.130000s % 1.46/1.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 1.130000s % 1.46/1.60 %------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.60 % File : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 1.46/1.60 % Domain : Syntactic % 1.46/1.60 % Problem : Harrison problem 2539 % 1.46/1.60 % Version : Especial. % 1.46/1.60 % English : % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 % Refs : [Har01] Email to G. Sutcliffe % 1.46/1.60 % Source : [Har01] % 1.46/1.60 % Names : % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 1.46/1.60 % Rating : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.20 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0 % 1.46/1.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR) % 1.46/1.60 % Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 20 neg) % 1.46/1.60 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg) % 1.46/1.60 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg) % 1.46/1.60 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty) % 1.46/1.60 % Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty) % 1.46/1.60 % Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn) % 1.46/1.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 % Comments : % 1.46/1.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 p2(X0,X0) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p9_2,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 p9(c14,c10) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p8_3,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 p8(c11,c14) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 p2(f7(c10,c14),c15) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 p2(f6(c15,c11),c16) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_6,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p2(f5(X9),f5(X10)) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X9,X10) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_8,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p2(f4(X7),f4(X8)) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X7,X8) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_9,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p2(X1,X2) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X0,X1) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X0,X2) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p9_10,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p9(X23,X24) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X26,X24) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p9(X25,X26) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X25,X23) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p8_11,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p8(X19,X20) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X22,X20) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p8(X21,X22) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X21,X19) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p2(f3(X3,X4),f3(X5,X6)) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X3,X5) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X4,X6) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_13,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p2(f7(X15,X16),f7(X17,X18)) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X15,X17) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X16,X18) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(p2_14,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( p2(f6(X11,X12),f6(X13,X14)) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X12,X14) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(X11,X13) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 cnf(not_p9_15,negated_conjecture, % 1.46/1.60 ( ~ p9(X28,c10) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p8(c11,X28) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(f7(c10,X28),X27) % 1.46/1.60 | ~ p2(f6(X27,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13)) ) ). % 1.46/1.60 % 1.46/1.60 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.60 %------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.60 % Proof found % 1.46/1.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 1.46/1.60 % SZS output start Proof % 1.46/1.60 %ClaNum:15(EqnAxiom:0) % 1.46/1.60 %VarNum:61(SingletonVarNum:30) % 1.46/1.60 %MaxLitNum:4 % 1.46/1.60 %MaxfuncDepth:3 % 1.46/1.60 %SharedTerms:17 % 1.46/1.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 % 1.46/1.60 %singleGoalClaCount:6 % 1.46/1.60 [1]P1(a1,a2) % 1.46/1.60 [2]P2(a3,a1) % 1.46/1.60 [4]P3(f6(a2,a1),a7) % 1.46/1.60 [5]P3(f8(a7,a3),a9) % 1.46/1.60 [6]P3(f12(f11(f10(a4)),a5),a9) % 1.46/1.60 [3]P3(x31,x31) % 1.46/1.60 [7]~P3(x71,x72)+P3(f10(x71),f10(x72)) % 1.46/1.60 [8]~P3(x81,x82)+P3(f11(x81),f11(x82)) % 1.46/1.60 [9]~P3(x93,x91)+P3(x91,x92)+~P3(x93,x92) % 1.46/1.60 [12]~P3(x122,x124)+~P3(x121,x123)+P3(f6(x121,x122),f6(x123,x124)) % 1.46/1.60 [13]~P3(x132,x134)+~P3(x131,x133)+P3(f8(x131,x132),f8(x133,x134)) % 1.46/1.60 [14]~P3(x142,x144)+~P3(x141,x143)+P3(f12(x141,x142),f12(x143,x144)) % 1.46/1.61 [15]~P2(a3,x151)+~P1(x151,a2)+~P3(f6(a2,x151),x152)+~P3(f8(x152,a3),f12(f11(f10(a4)),a5)) % 1.46/1.61 [10]~P1(x103,x104)+P1(x101,x102)+~P3(x103,x101)+~P3(x104,x102) % 1.46/1.61 [11]~P2(x113,x114)+P2(x111,x112)+~P3(x113,x111)+~P3(x114,x112) % 1.46/1.61 %EqnAxiom % 1.46/1.61 % 1.46/1.61 %------------------------------------------- % 1.46/1.61 cnf(55,plain, % 1.46/1.61 (P3(a9,f8(a7,a3))), % 1.46/1.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,3,9])). % 1.46/1.61 cnf(75,plain, % 1.46/1.61 (P3(a9,f12(f11(f10(a4)),a5))), % 1.46/1.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,3,9])). % 1.46/1.61 cnf(350,plain, % 1.46/1.61 (~P3(a1,x3501)+P2(a3,x3501)), % 1.46/1.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,11])). % 1.46/1.61 cnf(356,plain, % 1.46/1.61 (~P3(f8(a7,a3),f12(f11(f10(a4)),a5))), % 1.46/1.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4,1,350,15])). % 1.46/1.61 cnf(357,plain, % 1.46/1.61 ($false), % 1.46/1.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[55,356,75,9]), % 1.46/1.61 ['proof']). % 1.46/1.61 % SZS output end Proof % 1.46/1.61 % Total time :1.130000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------