↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN561-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.02s 1.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  28 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  30   ~;  23   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  23   !;   0   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    p9(c14,c10),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_2) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    p8(c11,c14),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p8_3) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f7(c10,c14),c15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f6(c15,c11),c16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_6) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p2(X2,X1)
      | ~ p2(X2,X0)
      | p2(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_9) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p2(f6(X1,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13))
      | ~ p2(f7(c10,X0),X1)
      | ~ p8(c11,X0)
      | ~ p9(X0,c10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p9_15) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p2(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    p9(c14,c10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    p8(c11,c14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f7(c10,c14),c15),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f6(c15,c11),c16),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_72,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p2(X1,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ p8(c11,X1)
      | ~ p9(X1,c10)
      | ~ p2(f7(c10,X1),X0)
      | ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_154,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f5(c12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_155,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f4(iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_156,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f3(iPr_def_11,c13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_157,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f6(c15,c11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_158,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = f7(c10,c14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ p8(c11,X0)
      | ~ p9(X0,c10)
      | ~ p2(f6(X1,c11),iPr_def_12)
      | ~ p2(f7(c10,X0),X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_154,c_155,c_156]) ).

tcf(c_165,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p2(X1,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_168,negated_conjecture,
    p2(iPr_def_12,c16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

tcf(c_169,negated_conjecture,
    p2(iPr_def_13,c16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_157]) ).

tcf(c_170,negated_conjecture,
    p2(iPr_def_14,c15),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_158]) ).

tcf(c_171,negated_conjecture,
    p8(c11,c14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).

tcf(c_172,negated_conjecture,
    p9(c14,c10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

tcf(c_173,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p2(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

tcf(c_502,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p8(c11,c14)
      | ~ p9(c14,c10)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_14,X0)
      | ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_159]) ).

tcf(c_503,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(iPr_def_14,X0)
      | ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_502,c_171,c_172]) ).

tcf(c_531,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p2(c16,X0)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_12,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_168,c_165]) ).

tcf(c_532,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p2(c16,X0)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_13,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_169,c_165]) ).

tcf(c_812,plain,
    p2(c16,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_531]) ).

tcf(c_845,plain,
    p2(c16,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_173,c_532]) ).

tcf(c_849,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p2(iPr_def_13,X0)
      | ~ p2(c16,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_845,c_165]) ).

tcf(c_945,plain,
    p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_812,c_849]) ).

tcf(c_991,plain,
    ( ~ p2(iPr_def_14,c15)
    | ~ p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_157,c_503]) ).

tcf(c_992,plain,
    ~ p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_991,c_170]) ).

tcf(c_993,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_992,c_945]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN561-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:43:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.46  % Proving...
% 3.02/1.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.02/1.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.02/1.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.02/1.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Proving...
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % 
% 3.02/1.31  % clauses                               20
% 3.02/1.31  % conjectures                           15
% 3.02/1.31  % EPR                                   9
% 3.02/1.31  % Horn                                  20
% 3.02/1.31  % unary                                 11
% 3.02/1.31  % binary                                2
% 3.02/1.31  % lits                                  39
% 3.02/1.31  % lits eq                               5
% 3.02/1.31  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.02/1.31  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.02/1.31  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.02/1.31  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.02/1.31  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ 
% 3.02/1.31  % Current options:
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % ------ Proving...
% 3.02/1.31  % 
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.02/1.31  
% 3.02/1.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------