↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:48:28 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.73s 3.91s
% Output   : Refutation 3.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   8 unt;   4 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_p2_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_4) ).

cnf(not_p2_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_5) ).

cnf(not_p2_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_12) ).

cnf(not_p2_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_6) ).

cnf(p5_3,negated_conjecture,
    p5(f8(f6(X4)),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p5_3) ).

cnf(p2_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(f6(X15),f6(X14))
    | ~ p5(X15,X14) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_10) ).

cnf(c4,plain,
    p2(f6(f8(f6(X39))),f6(X39)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p2_10,p5_3]) ).

cnf(p2_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( p2(X60,f3(f4(c10)))
    | p2(X60,f3(f7(f4(c10))))
    | p2(X60,f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))
    | p2(X60,f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10))))))
    | ~ p2(f6(f8(X60)),X60) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_19) ).

cnf(c55,plain,
    ( p2(f6(X113),f3(f4(c10)))
    | p2(f6(X113),f3(f7(f4(c10))))
    | p2(f6(X113),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))
    | p2(f6(X113),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p2_19,c4]) ).

cnf(c226,plain,
    ( p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10)))
    | p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10))))
    | p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c55,not_p2_6]) ).

cnf(c2657,plain,
    ( p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10)))
    | p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10)))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c226,not_p2_12]) ).

cnf(c5061,plain,
    p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2657,not_p2_5]) ).

cnf(c5080,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5061,not_p2_4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed May  8 19:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.73/3.91  % Version:  1.5
% 3.73/3.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.73/3.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.73/3.91  
% 3.73/3.91  % Initial clauses    : 19
% 3.73/3.91  % Processed clauses  : 387
% 3.73/3.91  % Factors computed   : 2
% 3.73/3.91  % Resolvents computed: 5079
% 3.73/3.91  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 3.73/3.91  % Forward subsumed   : 513
% 3.73/3.91  % Backward subsumed  : 4
% 3.73/3.91  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 3.73/3.91  % User time          : 3.552 s
% 3.73/3.91  % System time        : 0.021 s
% 3.73/3.91  % Total time         : 3.573 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------