↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SYN570-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:05:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN570-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 23:00:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.66  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.66  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.66  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.60/0.66  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.66  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.66  
% 0.60/0.66  % Result      :Theorem 0.060000s
% 0.60/0.66  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.060000s
% 0.60/0.66  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  % File     : SYN570-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.60/0.67  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 0.60/0.67  % Problem  : Harrison problem 3089
% 0.60/0.67  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.60/0.67  % English  :
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  % Refs     : [Har01] Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.60/0.67  % Source   : [Har01]
% 0.60/0.67  % Names    :
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.60/0.67  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0
% 0.60/0.67  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of literals    :   39 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   7 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.60/0.67  %            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn)
% 0.60/0.67  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  % Comments :
% 0.60/0.67  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p10_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p10(X0,X0) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p7_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p7(X21,X21) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p6_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p6(X18,X18) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p3_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p3(X12,X12) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p2(X7,X7) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p11_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p11(c12,c14) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p9_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p9(c15,f8(c13)) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p2_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p2(c12,f5(c15)) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p3_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      p3(f4(f5(X17)),X17) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(not_p9_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ~ p9(f4(c12),f8(c13)) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p7_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p7(f8(X24),f8(X25))
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p6(X24,X25) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p2(f5(X10),f5(X11))
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p3(X10,X11) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p3_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p3(f4(X15),f4(X16))
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p2(X15,X16) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p10_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p10(X1,X2)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p10(X0,X1)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p10(X0,X2) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p7_15,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p7(X22,X23)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p7(X21,X22)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p7(X21,X23) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p6_16,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p6(X19,X20)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p6(X18,X19)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p6(X18,X20) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p3_17,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p3(X13,X14)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p3(X12,X13)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p3(X12,X14) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p2_18,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p2(X8,X9)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p2(X7,X8)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p2(X7,X9) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p9_19,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p9(X26,X27)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p7(X29,X27)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p9(X28,X29)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p3(X28,X26) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(p11_20,negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.67      ( p11(X3,X4)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p11(X6,X5)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p2(X6,X3)
% 0.60/0.67      | ~ p10(X5,X4) ) ).
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.67  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.67  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.67  %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.60/0.67  %VarNum:70(SingletonVarNum:35)
% 0.60/0.67  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.60/0.67  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.60/0.67  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.60/0.67  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
% 0.60/0.67  %singleGoalClaCount:10
% 0.60/0.67  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.60/0.67  [7]P6(a1,f5(a4))
% 0.60/0.67  [8]P7(a4,f7(a3))
% 0.60/0.67  [10]~P7(f6(a1),f7(a3))
% 0.60/0.67  [2]P2(x21,x21)
% 0.60/0.67  [3]P3(x31,x31)
% 0.60/0.67  [4]P4(x41,x41)
% 0.60/0.67  [5]P5(x51,x51)
% 0.60/0.67  [6]P6(x61,x61)
% 0.60/0.67  [9]P5(f6(f5(x91)),x91)
% 0.60/0.67  [11]~P4(x111,x112)+P3(f7(x111),f7(x112))
% 0.60/0.67  [12]~P6(x121,x122)+P5(f6(x121),f6(x122))
% 0.60/0.67  [13]~P5(x131,x132)+P6(f5(x131),f5(x132))
% 0.60/0.67  [14]~P2(x143,x141)+P2(x141,x142)+~P2(x143,x142)
% 0.60/0.67  [15]~P3(x153,x151)+P3(x151,x152)+~P3(x153,x152)
% 0.60/0.67  [16]~P4(x163,x161)+P4(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x162)
% 0.60/0.67  [17]~P5(x173,x171)+P5(x171,x172)+~P5(x173,x172)
% 0.60/0.67  [18]~P6(x183,x181)+P6(x181,x182)+~P6(x183,x182)
% 0.60/0.67  [19]~P1(x194,x193)+P1(x191,x192)+~P2(x193,x192)+~P6(x194,x191)
% 0.60/0.67  [20]~P7(x204,x203)+P7(x201,x202)+~P3(x203,x202)+~P5(x204,x201)
% 0.60/0.67  %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.67  
% 0.60/0.67  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.60/0.67     (P5(x221,f6(f5(x221)))),
% 0.60/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[9,5,17])).
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.60/0.67     (P7(f6(f5(a4)),f7(a3))),
% 0.60/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,3,8,20])).
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.60/0.67     (P6(f5(a4),a1)),
% 0.60/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,6,18])).
% 0.60/0.67  cnf(41,plain,
% 0.60/0.67     ($false),
% 0.60/0.67     inference(scs_inference,[],[29,3,25,10,12,20]),
% 0.60/0.67     ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.67  % Total time :0.060000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------