↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN572-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:35:16 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 12.72s 2.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   91 (   0 equ;  44 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  113 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X3,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_12) ).

cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).

cnf(p2_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | p2(f3(X1,X2),f3(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_20) ).

cnf(p2_11,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f9(X1)),f5(f7(f8(c13)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_11) ).

cnf(p12_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p12(X3,X4)
    | ~ p4(X4,X2)
    | ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | p12(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p12_18) ).

cnf(p4_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X2,X4)
    | ~ p4(X1,X3)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_19) ).

cnf(p12_15,negated_conjecture,
    p12(f10(f3(X1,X2)),f11(f10(X1),f10(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p12_15) ).

cnf(p4_4,negated_conjecture,
    p4(f10(f9(X1)),f10(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_4) ).

cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f5(f7(f8(c13)))),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).

cnf(p4_3,negated_conjecture,
    p4(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_3) ).

cnf(p4_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X2)
    | p4(f10(X1),f10(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_9) ).

cnf(p2_17,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f3(X2,X3)),f3(f3(X1,X2),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_17) ).

cnf(not_p12_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p12(f10(c14),f11(f10(f3(c14,c15)),f10(c15))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p12_16) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X3,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X3,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    p2_1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | p2(f3(X1,X2),f3(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X2,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f9(X1)),f5(f7(f8(c13)))),
    p2_11 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p12(X3,X4)
    | ~ p4(X4,X2)
    | ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | p12(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p12_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X2,X4)
    | ~ p4(X1,X3)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | p2(f3(X1,X2),f3(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f5(f7(f8(c13))),f3(X1,f9(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p12(X3,X4)
    | ~ p4(X4,X2)
    | ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | p12(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    p12(f10(f3(X1,X2)),f11(f10(X1),f10(X2))),
    p12_15 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X2,X4)
    | ~ p4(X1,X3)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    p4(f10(f9(X1)),f10(X1)),
    p4_4 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f5(f7(f8(c13)))),X1),
    p2_5 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X2)
    | p2(f3(X1,f5(f7(f8(c13)))),f3(X2,f3(X3,f9(X3)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(f10(f3(X3,X4)),X1)
    | ~ p4(f11(f10(X3),f10(X4)),X2)
    | p12(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    p4(X1,X1),
    p4_3 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X1,X3)
    | p4(f11(X1,f10(f9(X2))),f11(X3,f10(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f3(X2,f5(f7(f8(c13)))),X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f5(f7(f8(c13)))),f3(X1,f3(X2,f9(X2)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(f11(f10(X1),f10(X2)),X3)
    | p12(f10(f3(X1,X2)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    p4(f11(X1,f10(f9(X2))),f11(X1,f10(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f3(X2,f9(X2))),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    p12(f10(f3(X1,f9(X2))),f11(f10(X1),f10(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X2)
    | p4(f10(X1),f10(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f3(X2,f3(X3,f9(X3))),X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(X1,f3(X2,X3)),f3(f3(X1,X2),X3)),
    p2_17 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(f10(f3(X3,f9(X4))),X1)
    | ~ p4(f11(f10(X3),f10(X4)),X2)
    | p12(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X1,X2)
    | p4(f10(X1),f10(X2)) ),
    c_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(f3(X1,X2),f9(X2)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p12(f10(c14),f11(f10(f3(c14,c15)),f10(c15))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p12_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(f10(f3(X2,f9(X3))),X1)
    | p12(X1,f11(f10(X2),f10(X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    p4(f10(f3(f3(X1,X2),f9(X2))),f10(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p12(f10(c14),f11(f10(f3(c14,c15)),f10(c15))),
    c_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    p12(f10(X1),f11(f10(f3(X1,X2)),f10(X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN572-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.38  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:08:43 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.72/2.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 12.72/2.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.72/2.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2703460 completed with status 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 12.72/2.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.72/2.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 12.72/2.53  % No SInE strategy applied
% 12.72/2.53  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 12.72/2.53  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % new_bool_3 with pid 2703469 completed with status 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 12.72/2.53  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.72/2.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 12.72/2.53  % No SInE strategy applied
% 12.72/2.53  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 12.72/2.53  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 12.72/2.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 12.72/2.53  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 12.72/2.53  
% 12.72/2.53  % Proof found!
% 12.72/2.53  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 12.72/2.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.72/2.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 20
% 12.72/2.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Initial clauses                      : 20
% 12.72/2.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 20
% 12.72/2.53  % Processed clauses                    : 3290
% 12.72/2.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 1229
% 12.72/2.53  % ...subsumed                          : 474
% 12.72/2.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1587
% 12.72/2.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 12.72/2.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 12.72/2.53  % Generated clauses                    : 91451
% 12.72/2.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 85140
% 12.72/2.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Paramodulations                      : 91451
% 12.72/2.53  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 7544
% 12.72/2.53  % ...of those cached                   : 5534
% 12.72/2.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 12.72/2.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 12.72/2.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 12.72/2.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 12.72/2.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 12.72/2.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1558
% 12.72/2.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 738
% 12.72/2.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 12.72/2.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 820
% 12.72/2.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 81890
% 12.72/2.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 91940
% 12.72/2.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 29
% 12.72/2.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109472
% 12.72/2.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78400
% 12.72/2.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 478
% 12.72/2.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 616
% 12.72/2.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 17298
% 12.72/2.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 12.72/2.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 12.72/2.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1885305
% 12.72/2.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 47
% 12.72/2.53  
% 12.72/2.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.72/2.53  % User time                : 1.923 s
% 12.72/2.53  % System time              : 0.101 s
% 12.72/2.53  % Total time               : 2.025 s
% 12.72/2.53  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 12.72/2.53  
% 12.72/2.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 12.72/2.53  % User time                : 8.795 s
% 12.72/2.53  % System time              : 0.406 s
% 12.72/2.53  % Total time               : 9.201 s
% 12.72/2.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 12.72/2.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------