%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN579-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:06:01 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 1.06s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.03s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN579-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 23:18:39 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.51/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.52/1.05 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/1.05 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.52/1.05 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.52/1.05 % Transform :cnf % 0.52/1.05 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.52/1.05 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 % Result :Theorem 0.460000s % 0.52/1.05 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.460000s % 0.52/1.05 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/1.05 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/1.05 % File : SYN579-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.52/1.05 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.52/1.05 % Problem : Harrison problem 3330 % 0.52/1.05 % Version : Especial. % 0.52/1.05 % English : % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 % Refs : [Har01] Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.52/1.05 % Source : [Har01] % 0.52/1.05 % Names : % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.52/1.05 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.00 v2.5.0 % 0.52/1.05 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 17 RR) % 0.52/1.05 % Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 27 neg) % 0.52/1.05 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg) % 0.52/1.05 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.52/1.05 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty) % 0.52/1.05 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.52/1.05 % Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn) % 0.52/1.05 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 % Comments : % 0.52/1.05 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p10_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p10(X0,X0) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p7_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p7(X21,X21) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p3_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p3(X12,X12) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p2(X7,X7) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p9_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p9(c12,c13) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p11_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p11(c14,c15) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p2(c16,f5(c14)) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p3_8,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p3(f4(f5(X17)),f4(X17)) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p3_9,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 p3(f6(f5(X20)),f6(X20)) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p9_10,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 ( p9(X32,c13) % 0.52/1.05 | ~ p9(X32,f6(c16)) ) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p9_11,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 ( p9(X32,f6(c16)) % 0.52/1.05 | ~ p9(X32,c13) ) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 ( p2(f5(X10),f5(X11)) % 0.52/1.05 | ~ p2(X10,X11) ) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p3_13,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 ( p3(f6(X18),f6(X19)) % 0.52/1.05 | ~ p2(X18,X19) ) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p3_14,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 ( p3(f4(X15),f4(X16)) % 0.52/1.05 | ~ p2(X15,X16) ) ). % 0.52/1.05 % 0.52/1.05 cnf(p10_15,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.05 ( p10(X1,X2) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p10(X0,X1) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p10(X0,X2) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p7_16,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p7(X22,X23) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p7(X21,X22) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p7(X21,X23) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p3_17,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p3(X13,X14) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p3(X12,X13) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p3(X12,X14) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p2_18,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p2(X8,X9) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p2(X7,X8) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p2(X7,X9) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p11_19,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p11(X3,X4) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p11(X6,X5) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p2(X6,X3) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p10(X5,X4) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p9_20,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p9(X28,X29) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p7(X31,X28) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p9(X31,X30) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p3(X30,X29) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p7_21,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p7(f8(X24,X25),f8(X26,X27)) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p2(X25,X27) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p3(X24,X26) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(p9_22,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( p9(f8(X33,X34),X33) % 0.52/1.06 | p9(f8(X33,X34),f6(X34)) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p11(X34,c15) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p9(c12,X33) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 cnf(not_p11_23,negated_conjecture, % 0.52/1.06 ( ~ p11(X34,c15) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p9(c12,X33) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p9(f8(X33,X34),X33) % 0.52/1.06 | ~ p9(f8(X33,X34),f6(X34)) ) ). % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.52/1.06 %------------------------------------------- % 0.52/1.06 % Proof found % 0.52/1.06 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.52/1.06 % SZS output start Proof % 0.52/1.06 %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.52/1.06 %VarNum:92(SingletonVarNum:42) % 0.52/1.06 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.52/1.06 %MaxfuncDepth:2 % 0.52/1.06 %SharedTerms:10 % 0.52/1.06 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 % 0.52/1.06 %singleGoalClaCount:9 % 0.52/1.06 [1]P1(a1,a2) % 0.52/1.06 [2]P2(a3,a4) % 0.52/1.06 [7]P6(a5,f6(a3)) % 0.52/1.06 [3]P3(x31,x31) % 0.52/1.06 [4]P4(x41,x41) % 0.52/1.06 [5]P5(x51,x51) % 0.52/1.06 [6]P6(x61,x61) % 0.52/1.06 [8]P5(f7(f6(x81)),f7(x81)) % 0.52/1.06 [9]P5(f8(f6(x91)),f8(x91)) % 0.52/1.06 [10]~P1(x101,a2)+P1(x101,f8(a5)) % 0.52/1.06 [11]P1(x111,a2)+~P1(x111,f8(a5)) % 0.52/1.06 [12]~P6(x121,x122)+P5(f7(x121),f7(x122)) % 0.52/1.06 [13]~P6(x131,x132)+P5(f8(x131),f8(x132)) % 0.52/1.06 [14]~P6(x141,x142)+P6(f6(x141),f6(x142)) % 0.52/1.06 [15]~P3(x153,x151)+P3(x151,x152)+~P3(x153,x152) % 0.52/1.06 [16]~P4(x163,x161)+P4(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x162) % 0.52/1.06 [17]~P5(x173,x171)+P5(x171,x172)+~P5(x173,x172) % 0.52/1.06 [18]~P6(x183,x181)+P6(x181,x182)+~P6(x183,x182) % 0.52/1.06 [21]~P5(x211,x213)+~P6(x212,x214)+P4(f9(x211,x212),f9(x213,x214)) % 0.52/1.06 [22]~P2(x222,a4)+~P1(a1,x221)+P1(f9(x221,x222),x221)+P1(f9(x221,x222),f8(x222)) % 0.52/1.06 [23]~P1(f9(x232,x231),x232)+~P1(f9(x232,x231),f8(x231))+~P2(x231,a4)+~P1(a1,x232) % 0.52/1.06 [19]~P1(x193,x194)+P1(x191,x192)+~P4(x193,x191)+~P5(x194,x192) % 0.52/1.06 [20]~P2(x204,x203)+P2(x201,x202)+~P3(x203,x202)+~P6(x204,x201) % 0.52/1.06 %EqnAxiom % 0.52/1.06 % 0.52/1.06 %------------------------------------------- % 1.03/1.17 cnf(53,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (P5(f8(x531),f8(f6(x531)))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,5,17])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(56,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (~P1(x561,f8(f6(x562)))+P1(x561,f8(x562))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,4,5,17,19])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(63,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (~P1(x631,f8(x632))+P1(x631,f8(f6(x632)))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[53,4,19])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(65,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (P1(f9(f8(a3),a3),f8(f6(a3)))+~P1(a1,f8(a3))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[53,2,4,19,22])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(73,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (P1(f9(f8(a3),a3),f8(a3))+~P1(a1,f8(a3))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[65,56])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(74,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (~P1(a1,f8(a3))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,73,23])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(75,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (~P1(a1,f8(f6(a3)))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[74,56])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(87,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (P1(a1,f8(f6(a5)))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10,63])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(89,plain, % 1.03/1.17 (P1(a1,f8(a5))), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,87,4,19])). % 1.03/1.17 cnf(226,plain, % 1.03/1.17 ($false), % 1.03/1.17 inference(scs_inference,[],[89,75,4,7,19,13]), % 1.03/1.17 ['proof']). % 1.03/1.17 % SZS output end Proof % 1.03/1.17 % Total time :0.460000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------