%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:06:01 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.83s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 20:46:54 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.48/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.57/0.82 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.82 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.57/0.82 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.57/0.82 % Transform :cnf % 0.57/0.82 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.57/0.82 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.57/0.82 % 0.57/0.82 % Result :Theorem 0.200000s % 0.57/0.82 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.200000s % 0.57/0.82 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.83 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.83 % File : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.57/0.83 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.57/0.83 % Problem : Harrison problem 3466 % 0.57/0.83 % Version : Especial. % 0.57/0.83 % English : % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 % Refs : [Har01] Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.57/0.83 % Source : [Har01] % 0.57/0.83 % Names : % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.57/0.83 % Rating : 0.00 v2.5.0 % 0.57/0.83 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 22 RR) % 0.57/0.83 % Number of literals : 56 ( 0 equ; 31 neg) % 0.57/0.83 % Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg) % 0.57/0.83 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.57/0.83 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 0.57/0.83 % Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.57/0.83 % Number of variables : 46 ( 0 sgn) % 0.57/0.83 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 % Comments : % 0.57/0.83 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p7_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p7(X34,X34) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p2(X18,X18) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p5_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p5(X31,X31) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p12_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p12(c13,c18) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p2(c18,c14) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p2(f3(c18),f8(f9(c17))) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p11_7,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p11(f4(f6(c15,c13)),c16) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p11_8,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 p11(f4(f6(c15,c14)),c16) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(not_p11_9,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ~ p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p11_10,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p11(X11,X12) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p12(X11,X12) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p11_11,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p11(X11,X12) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X11,X12) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p7_12,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p7(f9(X37),f9(X38)) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p7(X37,X38) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_13,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p2(f3(X21),f3(X22)) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X21,X22) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_14,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p2(f4(X23),f4(X24)) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X23,X24) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_15,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p2(f8(X29),f8(X30)) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p7(X29,X30) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p12_16,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p12(X11,X12) % 0.57/0.83 | p2(X11,X12) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p11(X11,X12) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p7_17,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p7(X35,X36) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p7(X34,X35) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p7(X34,X36) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_18,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p2(X19,X20) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X18,X19) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X18,X20) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p5_19,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p5(X32,X33) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p5(X31,X32) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p5(X31,X33) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p10_20,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p10(c15,f3(X6),X6) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p11(X6,c14) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p11(c13,X6) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p11_21,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p11(X7,X8) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X9,X7) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X10,X8) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p11(X9,X10) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p12_22,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p12(X14,X15) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X16,X14) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X17,X15) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p12(X16,X17) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p2_23,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p2(f6(X25,X26),f6(X27,X28)) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X26,X28) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p5(X25,X27) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p10_24,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p10(X0,X1,X2) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p5(X3,X0) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X5,X2) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(X4,X1) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p10(X3,X4,X5) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 cnf(p11_25,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.83 ( p11(f4(f6(c15,X13)),c16) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p12(X13,c14) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p12(c13,X13) % 0.57/0.83 | ~ p2(f3(X13),f8(f9(c17))) ) ). % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.83 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.83 % Proof found % 0.57/0.83 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.57/0.83 % SZS output start Proof % 0.57/0.83 %ClaNum:25(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.57/0.83 %VarNum:98(SingletonVarNum:46) % 0.57/0.83 %MaxLitNum:5 % 0.57/0.83 %MaxfuncDepth:2 % 0.57/0.83 %SharedTerms:21 % 0.57/0.83 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 % 0.57/0.83 %singleGoalClaCount:9 % 0.57/0.83 [1]P1(a1,a2) % 0.57/0.83 [2]P2(a3,a1) % 0.57/0.83 [6]P1(f7(a1),f9(f8(a4))) % 0.57/0.83 [7]P3(f11(f10(a5,a3)),a6) % 0.57/0.83 [8]P3(f11(f10(a5,a2)),a6) % 0.57/0.83 [9]~P3(f11(f10(a5,a1)),a6) % 0.57/0.83 [3]P5(x31,x31) % 0.57/0.83 [4]P1(x41,x41) % 0.57/0.83 [5]P6(x51,x51) % 0.57/0.83 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P3(x101,x102) % 0.57/0.83 [11]~P2(x111,x112)+P3(x111,x112) % 0.57/0.83 [12]~P5(x121,x122)+P5(f8(x121),f8(x122)) % 0.57/0.83 [13]~P1(x131,x132)+P1(f7(x131),f7(x132)) % 0.57/0.83 [14]~P5(x141,x142)+P1(f9(x141),f9(x142)) % 0.57/0.83 [15]~P1(x151,x152)+P1(f11(x151),f11(x152)) % 0.57/0.83 [22]~P3(x221,a2)+~P3(a3,x221)+P4(a5,f7(x221),x221) % 0.57/0.83 [16]P2(x161,x162)+~P3(x161,x162)+P1(x161,x162) % 0.57/0.83 [17]~P5(x173,x171)+P5(x171,x172)+~P5(x173,x172) % 0.57/0.83 [18]~P1(x183,x181)+P1(x181,x182)+~P1(x183,x182) % 0.57/0.83 [19]~P6(x193,x191)+P6(x191,x192)+~P6(x193,x192) % 0.57/0.83 [23]~P1(x232,x234)+~P6(x231,x233)+P1(f10(x231,x232),f10(x233,x234)) % 0.57/0.83 [24]~P2(x241,a2)+~P2(a3,x241)+~P1(f7(x241),f9(f8(a4)))+P3(f11(f10(a5,x241)),a6) % 0.57/0.83 [20]~P2(x204,x203)+P2(x201,x202)+~P1(x203,x202)+~P1(x204,x201) % 0.57/0.83 [21]~P3(x214,x213)+P3(x211,x212)+~P1(x213,x212)+~P1(x214,x211) % 0.57/0.83 [25]~P4(x256,x254,x255)+P4(x251,x252,x253)+~P1(x254,x252)+~P1(x255,x253)+~P6(x256,x251) % 0.57/0.83 %EqnAxiom % 0.57/0.83 % 0.57/0.83 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.83 cnf(26,plain, % 0.57/0.83 (~P1(f11(f10(a5,a1)),a6)), % 0.57/0.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,10])). % 0.57/0.83 cnf(28,plain, % 0.57/0.83 (~P2(f11(f10(a5,a1)),a6)), % 0.57/0.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,10,11])). % 0.57/0.84 cnf(30,plain, % 0.57/0.84 (P1(a2,a1)), % 0.57/0.84 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,9,10,11,18])). % 0.57/0.84 cnf(43,plain, % 0.57/0.84 (P1(f11(f10(a5,a2)),a6)+P2(f11(f10(a5,a2)),a6)), % 0.57/0.84 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,16])). % 0.57/0.84 cnf(136,plain, % 0.57/0.84 (~P1(x1361,f11(f10(a5,a1)))+~P2(x1361,a6)), % 0.57/0.84 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,4,20])). % 0.57/0.84 cnf(167,plain, % 0.57/0.84 (~P1(f11(f10(a5,a2)),f11(f10(a5,a1)))+P2(f11(f10(a5,a2)),a6)), % 0.57/0.84 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,43,18])). % 0.57/0.84 cnf(187,plain, % 0.57/0.84 (~P1(f11(f10(a5,a2)),f11(f10(a5,a1)))), % 0.57/0.84 inference(scs_inference,[],[167,136])). % 0.57/0.84 cnf(193,plain, % 0.57/0.84 ($false), % 0.57/0.84 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,187,4,5,15,18,23]), % 0.57/0.84 ['proof']). % 0.57/0.84 % SZS output end Proof % 0.57/0.84 % Total time :0.200000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------