%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SYN583-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:31:58 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s % Output : Refutation 0.21s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25420/SYN/SYN583-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ......................... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 187] [nf = 0] [nu = 154] [ut = 105] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 7556] [nf = 16] [nu = 5381] [ut = 876] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: p2_2(x0,x0) % B1: p5_2(x0,x0) % B15: ~p2_2(x1,x3) | ~p5_2(x0,x2) | p2_2(f6_2(x0,x1),f6_2(x2,x3)) % B16: ~p2_2(x2,x1) | ~p2_2(x2,x0) | p2_2(x0,x1) % B21: ~p11_2(x2,x3) | ~p2_2(x3,x1) | ~p2_2(x2,x0) | p11_2(x0,x1) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b nc > p2_2(c13_0(),c18_0()) % U4: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c3 t5 td3 b nc > p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c13_0())),c16_0()) % U5: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c3 t5 td3 b nc > ~p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c18_0())),c16_0()) % U106: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > p2_2(c18_0(),c13_0()) % U205: < d2 v2 dv1 f2 c2 t6 td2 > p2_2(f6_2(x0,c18_0()),f6_2(x0,c13_0())) % U1446: < d3 v2 dv1 f4 c2 t8 td3 > p2_2(f4_1(f6_2(x0,c13_0())),f4_1(f6_2(x0,c18_0()))) % U1682: < d3 v0 dv0 f2 c3 t5 td3 > p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c18_0())),c16_0()) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U2: % p2_2(c13_0(),c18_0()) ....... U2 % Derivation of unit clause U4: % p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c13_0())),c16_0()) ....... U4 % Derivation of unit clause U5: % ~p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c18_0())),c16_0()) ....... U5 % Derivation of unit clause U106: % p2_2(x0,x0) ....... B0 % ~p2_2(x2,x1) | ~p2_2(x2,x0) | p2_2(x0,x1) ....... B16 % ~p2_2(x0, x1) | p2_2(x1, x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B16:L0] % p2_2(c13_0(),c18_0()) ....... U2 % p2_2(c18_0(), c13_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U205: % p5_2(x0,x0) ....... B1 % ~p2_2(x1,x3) | ~p5_2(x0,x2) | p2_2(f6_2(x0,x1),f6_2(x2,x3)) ....... B15 % ~p2_2(x0, x1) | p2_2(f6_2(x2, x0), f6_2(x2, x1)) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B15:L1] % p2_2(c18_0(),c13_0()) ....... U106 % p2_2(f6_2(x0, c18_0()), f6_2(x0, c13_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U106:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U1446: % p2_2(x0,x0) ....... B0 % ~p2_2(x2,x1) | ~p2_2(x2,x0) | p2_2(x0,x1) ....... B16 % ~p2_2(x0, x1) | p2_2(x1, x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B16:L0] % ~p2_2(x0,x1) | p2_2(f4_1(x0),f4_1(x1)) ....... B12 % ~p2_2(x0, x1) | p2_2(f4_1(x1), f4_1(x0)) ....... R2 [R1:L1, B12:L0] % p2_2(f6_2(x0,c18_0()),f6_2(x0,c13_0())) ....... U205 % p2_2(f4_1(f6_2(x0, c13_0())), f4_1(f6_2(x0, c18_0()))) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U205:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U1682: % p2_2(x0,x0) ....... B0 % ~p11_2(x2,x3) | ~p2_2(x3,x1) | ~p2_2(x2,x0) | p11_2(x0,x1) ....... B21 % ~p11_2(x0, x1) | ~p2_2(x0, x2) | p11_2(x2, x1) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B21:L1] % p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c13_0())),c16_0()) ....... U4 % ~p2_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(), c13_0())), x0) | p11_2(x0, c16_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U4:L0] % p2_2(f4_1(f6_2(x0,c13_0())),f4_1(f6_2(x0,c18_0()))) ....... U1446 % p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(), c18_0())), c16_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U1446:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c18_0())),c16_0()) ....... U1682 % ~p11_2(f4_1(f6_2(c15_0(),c18_0())),c16_0()) ....... U5 % [] ....... R1 [U1682:L0, U5:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 17006 % resolvents: 16979 factors: 27 % Number of unit clauses generated: 14700 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 86.44 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 9 [1] = 96 [2] = 771 [3] = 807 % Total = 1683 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 14700 [2] = 2239 [3] = 67 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] p11_2 (+)837 (-)1 % [1] p12_2 (+)0 (-)1 % [2] p2_2 (+)836 (-)2 % [3] p5_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [4] p7_2 (+)5 (-)0 % [5] p10_3 (+)0 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)1679 (-)4 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 1683 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 453 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 17016 % Number of unification failures: 2690 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 2508 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 819 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 441 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 62 % Max entries in substitution set: 7 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 10706 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 5547 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 12 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 5 % Number of states in UCFA table: 4384 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 16443 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.04 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.27 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 51 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 19706 % ConstructUnitClause() = 12380 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.04 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 0 secs % CPU time: 0.20 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------