%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SYN585-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:12:38 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 73.36s 9.58s % Output : CNFRefutation 73.36s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SYN585-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 17:19:29 EDT 2022 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.11/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.11/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.11/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.11/0.36 # % 0.11/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.11/0.36 # Number of axioms: 26 Number of unprocessed: 26 % 0.11/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.11/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.11/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.11/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.11/0.36 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.11/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.11/0.36 # 26 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.11/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 26 conjectures. % 0.11/0.36 # There are 26 start rule candidates: % 0.11/0.36 # Found 12 unit axioms. % 0.11/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.11/0.36 # 26 start rule tableaux created. % 0.11/0.36 # 14 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.11/0.36 # 12 unit axiom clauses % 0.11/0.36 % 0.11/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 8 total branch saturation attempts. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 73.36/9.58 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 73.36/9.58 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 73.36/9.58 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 73.36/9.58 # Begin clausification derivation % 73.36/9.58 % 73.36/9.58 # End clausification derivation % 73.36/9.58 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (p10(c14,c15))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (p10(c17,c14))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X1))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (p11(c18,f9(c12,c14)))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(c15,c14),c17))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_35, negated_conjecture, (p2(f5(c15,c14),c16))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_37, negated_conjecture, (p2(f7(f8(c16,c14),c17),c15))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (~p2(c14,f3(c13)))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (~p2(c12,f3(c13)))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_36, negated_conjecture, (~p2(c12,f3(f4(c13))))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (~p11(c18,f9(c12,f8(c16,c14))))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X2)|~p11(X3,X2)|~p11(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,f8(X2,X3))|~p11(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (p2(f3(X1),f3(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (p2(f4(X1),f4(X2))|~p2(X1,X2))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (p11(f9(X1,X2),f9(X1,X3))|p2(X1,f3(c13))|~p11(X2,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X2)|~p11(X3,X4)|~p2(X4,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (p10(X1,X2)|~p10(X3,X4)|~p2(X4,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X2)|p2(X3,f3(c13))|~p11(f9(X3,X1),f9(X3,X2)))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (p2(f9(X1,X2),f9(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (p2(f6(X1,X2),f6(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (p2(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (p2(f8(X1,X2),f8(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (p2(f7(X1,X2),f7(X3,X4))|~p2(X2,X4)|~p2(X1,X3))). % 73.36/9.58 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 73.36/9.58 # Begin printing tableau % 73.36/9.58 # Found 6 steps % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_38, negated_conjecture, (~p11(c18,f9(c12,f8(c16,c14)))), inference(start_rule)). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_94, plain, (~p11(c18,f9(c12,f8(c16,c14)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_42])). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_547771, plain, (~p11(c18,f9(c12,c14))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_547770, plain, (~p11(f9(c12,c14),f9(c12,f8(c16,c14)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_52])). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_547795, plain, (p2(c12,f3(c13))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])). % 73.36/9.58 cnf(i_0_547796, plain, (~p11(c14,f8(c16,c14))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_547796, ...])). % 73.36/9.58 # End printing tableau % 73.36/9.58 # SZS output end % 73.36/9.58 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 73.51/9.59 # Child (15804) has found a proof. % 73.51/9.59 % 73.51/9.59 # Proof search is over... % 73.51/9.59 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------