↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN585-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.77s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  20 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   78 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  23   ~;  21   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  34   !;   0   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p11(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_2) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(c12,f3(c13)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_6) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    p11(c18,f9(c12,c14)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_7) ).

fof(f12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p11(c18,f9(c12,f8(c16,c14))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p11_12) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p11(X0,X2)
      | p11(X0,f8(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_13) ).

fof(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p11(X2,X1)
      | ~ p11(X0,X2)
      | p11(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_16) ).

fof(f26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p11(X1,X2)
      | p11(f9(X0,X1),f9(X0,X2))
      | p2(X0,f3(c13)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_26) ).

tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p11(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(c12,f3(c13)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    p11(c18,f9(c12,c14)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p11(c18,f9(c12,f8(c16,c14))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_87,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p11(X0,f8(X2,X1))
      | ~ p11(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p11(X0,X2)
      | ~ p11(X1,X2)
      | ~ p11(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p2(X2,f3(c13))
      | p11(f9(X2,X0),f9(X2,X1))
      | ~ p11(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_312,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f3(c13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_313,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f8(c16,c14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_314,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f9(c12,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_320,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = f9(c12,c14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_321,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p2(X2,iPr_def_10)
      | p11(f9(X2,X0),f9(X2,X1))
      | ~ p11(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_312]) ).

tcf(c_330,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p11(X0,X2)
      | ~ p11(X1,X2)
      | ~ p11(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

tcf(c_333,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p11(X0,f8(X2,X1))
      | ~ p11(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_87]) ).

tcf(c_334,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p11(c18,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_313,c_314]) ).

tcf(c_339,negated_conjecture,
    p11(c18,iPr_def_18),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_320]) ).

tcf(c_340,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(c12,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_80]) ).

tcf(c_342,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p11(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).

tcf(c_720,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p2(c12,iPr_def_10)
      | p11(f9(c12,X0),iPr_def_12)
      | ~ p11(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_314,c_321]) ).

tcf(c_721,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p11(f9(c12,X0),iPr_def_12)
      | ~ p11(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_720,c_340]) ).

tcf(c_765,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p11(X0,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ p11(X0,c14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_313,c_333]) ).

tcf(c_805,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p11(c18,X0)
      | ~ p11(iPr_def_18,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_339,c_330]) ).

tcf(c_932,plain,
    p11(c14,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_342,c_765]) ).

tcf(c_1291,plain,
    ( p11(iPr_def_18,iPr_def_12)
    | ~ p11(c14,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_721]) ).

tcf(c_1294,plain,
    p11(iPr_def_18,iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1291,c_932]) ).

tcf(c_1383,plain,
    p11(c18,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1294,c_805]) ).

tcf(c_1384,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1383,c_334]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN585-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:48:52 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.77/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.77/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.77/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.77/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % 
% 2.77/1.28  % clauses                               32
% 2.77/1.28  % conjectures                           23
% 2.77/1.28  % EPR                                   13
% 2.77/1.28  % Horn                                  30
% 2.77/1.28  % unary                                 19
% 2.77/1.28  % binary                                3
% 2.77/1.28  % lits                                  56
% 2.77/1.28  % lits eq                               9
% 2.77/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.77/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.77/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.77/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.77/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.77/1.28  % Current options:
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 2.77/1.28  % 
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.77/1.28  
% 2.77/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------