↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN596-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  13 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p10_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X3,X2)
    | ~ p10(X3,X1)
    | p10(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_15) ).

cnf(p18_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X4,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | ~ p18(X3,X4)
    | p18(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_23) ).

cnf(p10_1,negated_conjecture,
    p10(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_1) ).

cnf(p18_20,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_20) ).

cnf(p10_28,negated_conjecture,
    p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_28) ).

cnf(not_p18_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p18_21) ).

cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X3,X2)
    | ~ p10(X3,X1)
    | p10(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p10_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X4,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | ~ p18(X3,X4)
    | p18(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p18_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X3,X2)
    | ~ p10(X3,X1)
    | p10(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    p10(X1,X1),
    p10_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X4,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | ~ p18(X3,X4)
    | p18(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    p18_20 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X2,X1)
    | p10(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    p10_28 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24),X2)
    | ~ p2(c20,X1)
    | p18(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p18_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(c20,X1)
    | p18(X1,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    p2_4 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN596-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:11:01 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4142209 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.46  % Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 4142217 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.46  % Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.46  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 28
% 0.11/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 28
% 0.11/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 0.11/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 77
% 0.11/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 77
% 0.11/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 47
% 0.11/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.11/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 47
% 0.11/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 23
% 0.11/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.11/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 49
% 0.11/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 11
% 0.11/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.11/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 37
% 0.11/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.11/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4
% 0.11/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 28
% 0.11/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 181
% 0.11/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 164
% 0.11/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.11/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1905
% 0.11/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 78
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.46  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.46  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.11/0.46  
% 0.11/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.46  % User time                : 0.042 s
% 0.11/0.46  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.46  % Total time               : 0.054 s
% 0.11/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------