↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN596-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.10s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  25 unt;   8 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  23   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  11 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  29   !;   0   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p10(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_1) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p10(X2,X1)
      | ~ p10(X2,X0)
      | p10(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_15) ).

fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_20) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p18_21) ).

fof(f23,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p10(X3,X1)
      | ~ p2(X2,X0)
      | ~ p18(X2,X3)
      | p18(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p18_23) ).

fof(f28,negated_conjecture,
    p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_28) ).

tcf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p2(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p18(c20,f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_99,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p18(X3,X1)
      | ~ p18(X2,X0)
      | ~ p2(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    p10(f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c22)),c23,c24),f11(f13(f15(c20),f14(f4(c20),c21)),c23,c24)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    p2(c20,c20),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_80]) ).

tcf(c_337,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f15(c20),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_338,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f4(c20),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_339,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f14(iPr_def_11,c22),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_340,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f13(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_341,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = f11(iPr_def_13,c23,c24),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_342,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = f14(iPr_def_11,c21),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_343,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = f13(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_344,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = f11(iPr_def_16,c23,c24),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_345,negated_conjecture,
    p10(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_17),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_342,c_343,c_344,c_338,c_339,c_337,c_340,c_341]) ).

tcf(c_349,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p18(X3,X1)
      | ~ p18(X2,X0)
      | ~ p2(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tcf(c_350,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p18(c20,iPr_def_14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97]) ).

tcf(c_351,negated_conjecture,
    p18(c20,iPr_def_17),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_96]) ).

tcf(c_356,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_91]) ).

tcf(c_367,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_77]) ).

tcf(c_877,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(iPr_def_17,X0)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_14,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_345,c_356]) ).

tcf(c_947,plain,
    p10(iPr_def_17,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_367,c_877]) ).

tcf(c_979,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p18(X1,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p18(X0,iPr_def_17)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_947,c_349]) ).

tcf(c_989,plain,
    ( p18(c20,iPr_def_14)
    | ~ p18(c20,iPr_def_17)
    | ~ p2(c20,c20) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_979]) ).

tcf(c_990,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_989,c_351,c_350,c_106]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN596-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:49:42 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.42  
% 0.03/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.42  
% 0.03/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.03/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.10/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.10/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % 
% 2.10/1.29  % clauses                               31
% 2.10/1.29  % conjectures                           23
% 2.10/1.29  % EPR                                   14
% 2.10/1.29  % Horn                                  31
% 2.10/1.29  % unary                                 16
% 2.10/1.29  % binary                                6
% 2.10/1.29  % lits                                  57
% 2.10/1.29  % lits eq                               8
% 2.10/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.10/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.10/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.10/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.10/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ 
% 2.10/1.29  % Current options:
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.10/1.29  % 
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.10/1.29  
% 2.10/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------