↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN601-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.34s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   71 (  34 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  246 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  179 (  91   ~;  88   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   16 (  14 usr;   9 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  110 (   0 sgn 110   !;   0   ?;  82   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p10(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p9(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_2) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p3(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_3) ).

fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    p3(c22,c23),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_7) ).

fof(f17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p10(X2,X1)
      | ~ p10(X2,X0)
      | p10(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_17) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p3(X2,X1)
      | ~ p3(X2,X0)
      | p3(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_19) ).

fof(f22,negated_conjecture,
    p19(c21,f11(f13(f15(c21),f14(f4(c21),c22)),c24,c25)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p19_22) ).

fof(f23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p19(c21,f11(f13(f15(c21),f14(f4(c21),c23)),c24,c25)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p19_23) ).

fof(f24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p10(X3,X1)
      | ~ p2(X2,X0)
      | ~ p19(X2,X3)
      | p19(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p19_24) ).

fof(f27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p3(X1,X3)
      | ~ p3(X0,X2)
      | p12(f14(X0,X1),f14(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p12_27) ).

fof(f28,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p3(X0,X2)
      | ~ p12(X1,X3)
      | p2(f13(X0,X1),f13(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_28) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ p10(X2,X5)
      | ~ p9(X1,X4)
      | ~ p2(X0,X3)
      | p10(f11(X0,X1,X2),f11(X3,X4,X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_30) ).

tcf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p9(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p3(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_82,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p2(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    p3(c22,c23),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p3(X1,X2)
      | ~ p3(X0,X2)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
    p19(c21,f11(f13(f15(c21),f14(f4(c21),c22)),c24,c25)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p19(c21,f11(f13(f15(c21),f14(f4(c21),c23)),c24,c25)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

tcf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p19(X3,X1)
      | ~ p19(X2,X0)
      | ~ p2(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p12(f14(X0,X2),f14(X1,X3))
      | ~ p3(X2,X3)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p2(f13(X0,X2),f13(X1,X3))
      | ~ p12(X2,X3)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( p10(f11(X4,X2,X0),f11(X5,X3,X1))
      | ~ p2(X4,X5)
      | ~ p9(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    p2(c21,c21),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_82]) ).

tcf(c_356,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f14(iPr_def_11,c23),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_357,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f13(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_358,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_361,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = f14(iPr_def_11,c22),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_362,definition,
    iPr_def_18 = f13(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_17),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_18])],[]) ).

tcf(c_363,definition,
    iPr_def_19 = f11(iPr_def_18,c24,c25),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_19])],[]) ).

tcf(c_364,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( p10(f11(X4,X2,X0),f11(X5,X3,X1))
      | ~ p2(X4,X5)
      | ~ p9(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).

tcf(c_366,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p2(f13(X0,X2),f13(X1,X3))
      | ~ p12(X2,X3)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

tcf(c_367,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p12(f14(X0,X2),f14(X1,X3))
      | ~ p3(X2,X3)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105]) ).

tcf(c_368,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p19(X3,X1)
      | ~ p19(X2,X0)
      | ~ p2(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_102]) ).

tcf(c_369,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p19(c21,iPr_def_14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_101]) ).

tcf(c_370,negated_conjecture,
    p19(c21,iPr_def_19),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_100,c_361,c_362,c_363]) ).

tcf(c_373,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p3(X1,X2)
      | ~ p3(X0,X2)
      | ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97]) ).

tcf(c_375,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_95]) ).

tcf(c_383,negated_conjecture,
    p3(c22,c23),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_386,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p3(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

tcf(c_387,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p9(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_80]) ).

tcf(c_388,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79]) ).

tcf(c_392,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X1,X3)
      | ( X2 != X3 )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    theory(equality) ).

tcf(c_915,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p3(c23,X0)
      | ~ p3(c22,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_383,c_373]) ).

tcf(c_952,plain,
    p3(c23,c22),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_386,c_915]) ).

tcf(c_998,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p2(iPr_def_13,f13(X0,X1))
      | ~ p12(iPr_def_12,X1)
      | ~ p3(iPr_def_10,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_357,c_366]) ).

tcf(c_1029,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p12(iPr_def_12,f14(X1,X0))
      | ~ p3(iPr_def_11,X1)
      | ~ p3(c23,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_356,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_1231,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p19(X1,X0)
      | ~ p19(c21,iPr_def_19)
      | ~ p2(c21,X1)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_19,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_368]) ).

tcf(c_1278,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p10(X0,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_375]) ).

tcf(c_1528,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_14,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1278]) ).

tcf(c_1529,plain,
    p10(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_14),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_388]) ).

tcf(c_1546,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(iPr_def_14,X0)
      | ~ p10(X2,X1)
      | ( iPr_def_14 != X2 )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_392]) ).

tcf(c_2281,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(iPr_def_14,X0)
      | ~ p10(f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25),X1)
      | ( iPr_def_14 != f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25) )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1546]) ).

tcf(c_2620,plain,
    p10(c25,c25),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_388]) ).

tcf(c_3215,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p10(iPr_def_14,X0)
      | ~ p10(f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25),f11(X1,X2,X3))
      | ( iPr_def_14 != f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25) )
      | ( X0 != f11(X1,X2,X3) ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2281]) ).

tcf(c_3216,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25),f11(X2,X1,X0))
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_13,X2)
      | ~ p9(c24,X1)
      | ~ p10(c25,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_364]) ).

tcf(c_3471,plain,
    ( p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_18)
    | ~ p12(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_17)
    | ~ p3(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_362,c_998]) ).

tcf(c_3484,plain,
    ( p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_18)
    | ~ p12(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_17) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3471,c_386]) ).

tcf(c_3572,plain,
    ( p10(f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25),f11(iPr_def_18,c24,c25))
    | ~ p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_18)
    | ~ p9(c24,c24)
    | ~ p10(c25,c25) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_3216]) ).

tcf(c_3601,plain,
    ( p10(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_19)
    | ~ p10(f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25),f11(iPr_def_18,c24,c25))
    | ( iPr_def_19 != f11(iPr_def_18,c24,c25) )
    | ( iPr_def_14 != f11(iPr_def_13,c24,c25) ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_3215]) ).

tcf(c_3983,plain,
    p9(c24,c24),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_387]) ).

tcf(c_5209,plain,
    ( p12(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_17)
    | ~ p3(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11)
    | ~ p3(c23,c22) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_361,c_1029]) ).

tcf(c_5211,plain,
    p12(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_17),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5209,c_386,c_952]) ).

tcf(c_5216,plain,
    p2(iPr_def_13,iPr_def_18),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3484,c_5211]) ).

tcf(c_6904,plain,
    ( p10(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14)
    | ~ p10(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_19)
    | ~ p10(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1528]) ).

tcf(c_7926,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p19(X0,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p19(c21,iPr_def_19)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p2(c21,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1231]) ).

tcf(c_7927,plain,
    ( p19(c21,iPr_def_14)
    | ~ p19(c21,iPr_def_19)
    | ~ p2(c21,c21)
    | ~ p10(iPr_def_19,iPr_def_14) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_7926]) ).

tcf(c_7928,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_7927,c_6904,c_5216,c_3983,c_3601,c_3572,c_2620,c_1529,c_370,c_369,c_363,c_358,c_110]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN601-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:51:43 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.43  % Proving...
% 3.34/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.34/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.34/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % 
% 3.34/1.28  % clauses                               35
% 3.34/1.28  % conjectures                           25
% 3.34/1.28  % EPR                                   15
% 3.34/1.28  % Horn                                  35
% 3.34/1.28  % unary                                 19
% 3.34/1.28  % binary                                7
% 3.34/1.28  % lits                                  62
% 3.34/1.28  % lits eq                               10
% 3.34/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.34/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.34/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.34/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.34/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ 
% 3.34/1.28  % Current options:
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.34/1.28  % 
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.28  
% 3.34/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.34/1.29  
% 3.34/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------