%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN602-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:48:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 159.81s 160.07s
% Output : Refutation 159.81s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p15_3,negated_conjecture,
p15(c22,c21),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15_3) ).
cnf(p2_5,negated_conjecture,
p2(c22,f9(c20,c23)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).
cnf(not_p15_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p15(X68,c21)
| ~ p2(X68,f9(c20,X69))
| ~ p2(f7(f8(c21,X68),c20),f6(f5(c18),c19)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p15_26) ).
cnf(p2_2,negated_conjecture,
p2(X2,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_2) ).
cnf(p2_14,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X22,X23)
| ~ p2(X24,X22)
| ~ p2(X24,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_14) ).
cnf(c26,plain,
( p2(X27,X28)
| ~ p2(X28,X27) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p2_14,p2_2]) ).
cnf(p2_16,negated_conjecture,
p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(f5(c18),f3(c18))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_16) ).
cnf(c59,plain,
p2(f6(f5(c18),f3(c18)),f7(f8(c21,c22),c20)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p2_16,c26]) ).
cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture,
p2(f3(c18),c19),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).
cnf(c31,plain,
p2(c19,f3(c18)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c26,p2_4]) ).
cnf(p2_21,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f6(X49,X48),f6(X47,X46))
| ~ p2(X49,X47)
| ~ p2(X48,X46) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_21) ).
cnf(c173,plain,
( p2(f6(X216,c19),f6(X215,f3(c18)))
| ~ p2(X216,X215) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p2_21,c31]) ).
cnf(c4864,plain,
p2(f6(X217,c19),f6(X217,f3(c18))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c173,p2_2]) ).
cnf(c4986,plain,
p2(f6(X218,f3(c18)),f6(X218,c19)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4864,c26]) ).
cnf(c5026,plain,
( p2(X672,f6(X673,c19))
| ~ p2(f6(X673,f3(c18)),X672) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4986,p2_14]) ).
cnf(c50131,plain,
p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(f5(c18),c19)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5026,c59]) ).
cnf(c273930,plain,
( ~ p15(c22,c21)
| ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X1803)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c50131,not_p15_26]) ).
cnf(c274244,plain,
~ p15(c22,c21),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c273930,p2_5]) ).
cnf(c274245,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c274244,p15_3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN602-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Wed May 8 20:13:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 159.81/160.07 % Version: 1.5
% 159.81/160.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 159.81/160.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 159.81/160.07
% 159.81/160.07 % Initial clauses : 30
% 159.81/160.07 % Processed clauses : 2057
% 159.81/160.07 % Factors computed : 5
% 159.81/160.07 % Resolvents computed: 274241
% 159.81/160.07 % Tautologies deleted: 1
% 159.81/160.07 % Forward subsumed : 878
% 159.81/160.07 % Backward subsumed : 2
% 159.81/160.07 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 159.81/160.07 % User time : 159.080 s
% 159.81/160.07 % System time : 0.592 s
% 159.81/160.07 % Total time : 159.672 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------