↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN603-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  26 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   82 (  47   ~;  35   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  40   !;   0   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_2) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    p15(c22,c21),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15_3) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    p2(c22,f9(c20,c23)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(f4(c16)),c17),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_6) ).

fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p2(X2,X1)
      | ~ p2(X2,X0)
      | p2(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_14) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),f3(f4(c16)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_19) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p2(X1,X3)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2)
      | p2(f6(X0,X1),f6(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_21) ).

fof(f26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p2(f7(f8(c21,X0),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),c17))
      | ~ p2(X0,f9(c20,X1))
      | ~ p15(X0,c21) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p15_26) ).

tcf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p2(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_81,negated_conjecture,
    p15(c22,c21),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_83,negated_conjecture,
    p2(c22,f9(c20,c23)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(f4(c16)),c17),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p2(X1,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f7(f8(c21,c22),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),f3(f4(c16)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_99,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p2(f6(X0,X2),f6(X1,X3))
      | ~ p2(X2,X3)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ p15(X0,c21)
      | ~ p2(X0,f9(c20,X1))
      | ~ p2(f7(f8(c21,X0),c20),f6(f5(f4(c16)),c17)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_377,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f6(iPr_def_11,c17),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_378,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = f8(c21,c22),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_379,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = f7(iPr_def_14,c20),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_380,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = f6(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_381,definition,
    iPr_def_17 = f9(c20,c23),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_17])],[]) ).

tcf(c_385,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ p15(X0,c21)
      | ~ p2(X0,f9(c20,X1))
      | ~ p2(f7(f8(c21,X0),c20),iPr_def_13) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_104,c_377]) ).

tcf(c_388,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p2(f6(X0,X2),f6(X1,X3))
      | ~ p2(X2,X3)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_99]) ).

tcf(c_390,negated_conjecture,
    p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_380,c_378,c_379]) ).

tcf(c_392,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p2(X1,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92]) ).

tcf(c_398,negated_conjecture,
    p2(iPr_def_12,c17),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_399,negated_conjecture,
    p2(c22,iPr_def_17),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_83,c_381]) ).

tcf(c_401,negated_conjecture,
    p15(c22,c21),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_81]) ).

tcf(c_402,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p2(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_80]) ).

tcf(c_1091,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p15(c22,c21)
      | ~ p2(f7(iPr_def_14,c20),iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_378,c_385]) ).

tcf(c_1092,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p15(c22,c21)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X0)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1091,c_379]) ).

tcf(c_1093,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X0)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1092,c_401]) ).

tcf(c_1398,plain,
    ( ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ p2(c22,iPr_def_17) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_381,c_1093]) ).

tcf(c_1399,plain,
    ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1398,c_399]) ).

tcf(c_3243,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p15(c22,c21)
      | ~ p2(f7(iPr_def_14,c20),iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_378,c_385]) ).

tcf(c_3244,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p15(c22,c21)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X0)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3243,c_379]) ).

tcf(c_3245,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(c22,f9(c20,X0)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3244,c_401]) ).

tcf(c_4552,plain,
    ~ p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3245,c_1399]) ).

tcf(c_15104,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p2(iPr_def_16,X0)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_15,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_390,c_392]) ).

tcf(c_15213,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p2(f6(X0,X1),iPr_def_13)
      | ~ p2(X1,c17)
      | ~ p2(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_377,c_388]) ).

tcf(c_15437,plain,
    p2(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_15),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_402,c_15104]) ).

tcf(c_15440,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p2(iPr_def_15,X0)
      | ~ p2(iPr_def_16,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15437,c_392]) ).

tcf(c_15962,plain,
    ( p2(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_13)
    | ~ p2(iPr_def_12,c17)
    | ~ p2(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_380,c_15213]) ).

tcf(c_15967,plain,
    p2(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_13),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_15962,c_398,c_402]) ).

tcf(c_16008,plain,
    p2(iPr_def_15,iPr_def_13),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_15967,c_15440]) ).

tcf(c_16009,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16008,c_4552]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SYN603-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:51:05 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.04/0.32  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/0.33  
% 0.04/0.33  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.04/0.33  
% 0.04/0.33  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.33  % Proving...
% 0.60/0.97  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.60/0.97  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.60/0.97  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 10 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Proving...
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % 
% 0.60/0.97  % clauses                               29
% 0.60/0.97  % conjectures                           20
% 0.60/0.97  % EPR                                   8
% 0.60/0.97  % Horn                                  29
% 0.60/0.97  % unary                                 15
% 0.60/0.97  % binary                                5
% 0.60/0.97  % lits                                  55
% 0.60/0.97  % lits eq                               9
% 0.60/0.97  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.60/0.97  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.60/0.97  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.60/0.97  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.60/0.97  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ 
% 0.60/0.97  % Current options:
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % ------ Proving...
% 0.60/0.97  % 
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.97  
% 0.60/0.97  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------