%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem : SYN606-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 02:17:42 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.28s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 16 ~; 27 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 44 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_2) ).
fof(f4,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] : p3(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_4) ).
fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
p3(f12(f15(c22),c21),c22),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_7) ).
fof(f12,negated_conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( p2(f9(X0),f9(X1))
| ~ p3(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_12) ).
fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( p3(X0,X1)
| ~ p3(X2,X0)
| ~ p3(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_19) ).
fof(f20,negated_conjecture,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( p17(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X2,X0)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p17(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p17_20) ).
fof(f23,negated_conjecture,
p17(f9(f10(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),c22)),f6(f7(f8(c20)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p17_23) ).
fof(f25,negated_conjecture,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( p3(f10(X0,X1),f10(X2,X3))
| ~ p3(X0,X2)
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_25) ).
fof(f29,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] : ~ p17(f9(f10(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),f12(X0,c21))),f6(f7(f8(c20)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p17_29) ).
fof(f32,plain,
! [X0] : ~ p2(X0,X0),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
! [X0] : ~ p3(X0,X0),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
~ p3(f12(f15(c22),c21),c22),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p2(f9(X0),f9(X1))
| p3(X0,X1) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ p3(X0,X1)
| p3(X2,X0)
| p3(X2,X1) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ p17(X2,X3)
| p2(X2,X0)
| p2(X3,X1)
| p17(X0,X1) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ p3(f10(X0,X1),f10(X2,X3))
| p3(X0,X2)
| p3(X1,X3) ),
inference(consistent_polarity_flipping,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( p2(f9(f10(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),c22)),X0)
| p2(f6(f7(f8(c20))),X1)
| p17(X0,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f23,f50]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( p2(f6(f7(f8(c20))),X1)
| p17(f9(X0),X1)
| p3(f10(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),c22),X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f79,f42]) ).
fof(f191,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( p17(f9(f10(X0,X1)),X2)
| p3(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),X0)
| p2(f6(f7(f8(c20))),X2)
| p3(c22,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f89,f54]) ).
fof(f898,plain,
! [X0] :
( p3(f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19),f14(f4(f9(c19)),c19))
| p2(f6(f7(f8(c20))),f6(f7(f8(c20))))
| p3(c22,f12(X0,c21)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f191,f29]) ).
fof(f903,plain,
! [X0] :
( p2(f6(f7(f8(c20))),f6(f7(f8(c20))))
| p3(c22,f12(X0,c21)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f898,f34]) ).
fof(f904,plain,
! [X0] : p3(c22,f12(X0,c21)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f903,f32]) ).
fof(f924,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( p3(X0,f12(X1,c21))
| p3(X0,c22) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f904,f49]) ).
fof(f981,plain,
! [X0] : p3(f12(X0,c21),c22),
inference(resolution,[],[f924,f34]) ).
fof(f1018,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f981]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN606-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.18 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 16:36:04 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.18 Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.21 Running first-order model finding
% 0.07/0.21 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.28 % (293459)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=4204227612:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.19/0.28 % (293464)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=505288641_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293466)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=2015852048:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=777897796:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293468)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3527522345:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293469)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2355255180:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293470)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=3902420227:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.19/0.28 % TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.28 % TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.28 % TRYING [3]
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-293459-293465"...
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Time elapsed: 0.032 s
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.28 % (293467)Instructions burned: 106 (million)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.28 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Time elapsed: 0.025 s
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.28 % (293465)Instructions burned: 38 (million)
% 0.19/0.28 % (293459)Success in time 0.065 s
% 0.19/0.28 % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------