%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN620-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.86s 0.90s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p11_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X3,X2)
| ~ p11(X3,X1)
| p11(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_23) ).
cnf(p11_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X1,X2)
| p11(f12(X1),f12(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_18) ).
cnf(p20_28,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X4,X1)
| ~ p20(X4,X3)
| ~ p11(X3,X2)
| p20(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20_28) ).
cnf(p11_5,negated_conjecture,
p11(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p11_5) ).
cnf(p10_24,negated_conjecture,
p10(f13(f6(c22),X1),f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_24) ).
cnf(p20_32,negated_conjecture,
p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c24),X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20_32) ).
cnf(not_p20_33,negated_conjecture,
~ p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c22),c27))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p20_33) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X3,X2)
| ~ p11(X3,X1)
| p11(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p11_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X1,X2)
| p11(f12(X1),f12(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p11_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X4,X1)
| ~ p20(X4,X3)
| ~ p11(X3,X2)
| p20(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p20_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X3,X2)
| ~ p11(X3,X1)
| p11(X1,X2) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p11(X1,X1),
p11_5 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X1,X2)
| p11(f12(X1),f12(X2)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p10(f13(f6(c22),X1),f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,X1))),
p10_24 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X4,X1)
| ~ p20(X4,X3)
| ~ p11(X3,X2)
| p20(X1,X2) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c24),X1))),
p20_32 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(X2,X1)
| p11(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p11(f12(f13(f6(c22),X1)),f12(f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,X1)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(f12(f13(f6(c24),X3)),X2)
| ~ p11(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),X1)
| p20(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p11(f12(f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,X1))),f12(f13(f6(c22),X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c22),c27))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p20_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p11(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),X1)
| p20(X1,f12(f13(f6(c22),X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c22),c27))),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
p20(f12(f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),f12(f13(f6(c22),X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN620-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:10:10 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.86/0.90 % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.86/0.90 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.86/0.90 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1748167 completed with status 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 2.86/0.90 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.86/0.90 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.86/0.90 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.86/0.90 % Search class: FGUNM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.86/0.90 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % new_bool_1 with pid 1748178 completed with status 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 2.86/0.90 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 2.86/0.90 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.86/0.90 % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.86/0.90 % Search class: FGUNM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 2.86/0.90 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.86/0.90 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 2.86/0.90 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.86/0.90
% 2.86/0.90 % Proof found!
% 2.86/0.90 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.86/0.90 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.86/0.90 % Parsed axioms : 34
% 2.86/0.90 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Initial clauses : 34
% 2.86/0.90 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 2.86/0.90 % Processed clauses : 3092
% 2.86/0.90 % ...of these trivial : 566
% 2.86/0.90 % ...subsumed : 2
% 2.86/0.90 % ...remaining for further processing : 2524
% 2.86/0.90 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 2.86/0.90 % Generated clauses : 18661
% 2.86/0.90 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15777
% 2.86/0.90 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Paramodulations : 18661
% 2.86/0.90 % Factorizations : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % NegExts : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Total rewrite steps : 3449
% 2.86/0.90 % ...of those cached : 1040
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional check models : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.86/0.90 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.86/0.90 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.86/0.90 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.86/0.90 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.86/0.90 % Current number of processed clauses : 2489
% 2.86/0.90 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1339
% 2.86/0.90 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 2.86/0.90 % Non-unit-clauses : 1147
% 2.86/0.90 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12753
% 2.86/0.90 % ...number of literals in the above : 13271
% 2.86/0.90 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Current number of archived clauses : 35
% 2.86/0.90 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 133043
% 2.86/0.90 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 116216
% 2.86/0.90 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 2.86/0.90 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5546
% 2.86/0.90 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % BW rewrite match attempts : 44900
% 2.86/0.90 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 2.86/0.90 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Condensation successes : 0
% 2.86/0.90 % Termbank termtop insertions : 425303
% 2.86/0.90 % Search garbage collected termcells : 97
% 2.86/0.90
% 2.86/0.90 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.86/0.90 % User time : 0.407 s
% 2.86/0.90 % System time : 0.040 s
% 2.86/0.90 % Total time : 0.447 s
% 2.86/0.90 % Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 2.86/0.90
% 2.86/0.90 % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.86/0.90 % User time : 2.044 s
% 2.86/0.90 % System time : 0.134 s
% 2.86/0.90 % Total time : 2.178 s
% 2.86/0.90 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 2.86/0.90 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------