↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN624-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.85s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  28 unt;   7 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  141 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   72 (  38   ~;  34   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   8 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (   0 sgn  58   !;   0   ?;  47   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p10(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_1) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p5(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p5_2) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p10(f16(X0,f14(f15(f7(c25)))),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_11) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p10(X2,X1)
      | ~ p10(X2,X0)
      | p10(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_21) ).

fof(f26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p10(f13(f6(c22),X0),f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,X0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_26) ).

fof(f28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p10(f13(f6(c24),c26),f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p10_28) ).

fof(f32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p5(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X1,X3)
      | p10(f13(X0,X1),f13(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_32) ).

tcf(c_84,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p5(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(f16(X0,f14(f15(f7(c25)))),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_109,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(f13(f6(c22),X0),f13(f6(c24),f16(c26,X0))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_111,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p10(f13(f6(c24),c26),f13(f6(c22),f14(f15(f7(c25))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_115,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p10(f13(X2,X0),f13(X3,X1))
      | ~ p5(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_385,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f6(c24),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_386,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f13(iPr_def_10,c26),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_387,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f6(c22),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_388,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f7(c25),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_389,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = f15(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_390,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = f14(iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_391,definition,
    iPr_def_16 = f13(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_16])],[]) ).

tcf(c_395,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p10(f13(X2,X0),f13(X3,X1))
      | ~ p5(X2,X3)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_115]) ).

tcf(c_396,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p10(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_111,c_388,c_389,c_390,c_387,c_391,c_385,c_386]) ).

tcf(c_397,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(f13(iPr_def_12,X0),f13(iPr_def_10,f16(c26,X0))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_109]) ).

tcf(c_402,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_104]) ).

tcf(c_412,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(f16(X0,iPr_def_15),X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).

tcf(c_417,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p5(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_418,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_84]) ).

tcf(c_905,plain,
    p10(iPr_def_16,f13(iPr_def_10,f16(c26,iPr_def_15))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_391,c_397]) ).

tcf(c_991,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,X1)
      | ~ p10(f16(X0,iPr_def_15),X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_412,c_402]) ).

tcf(c_993,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(f13(iPr_def_10,f16(c26,iPr_def_15)),X0)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_905,c_402]) ).

tcf(c_1039,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(f13(X1,X0),iPr_def_11)
      | ~ p5(X1,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ p10(X0,c26) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_386,c_395]) ).

tcf(c_1166,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_402]) ).

tcf(c_1204,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(X0,f16(X0,iPr_def_15)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_418,c_991]) ).

tcf(c_1212,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(f16(X0,iPr_def_15),X1)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1204,c_402]) ).

tcf(c_1227,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p10(X2,X1)
      | ~ p10(X0,X2)
      | ~ p10(f16(X0,iPr_def_15),X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1212,c_402]) ).

tcf(c_1236,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X0)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X1)
      | ~ p10(f13(iPr_def_10,f16(c26,iPr_def_15)),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_993,c_402]) ).

tcf(c_1625,plain,
    p10(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_16),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_418]) ).

tcf(c_1628,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_402]) ).

tcf(c_2694,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1628]) ).

tcf(c_7682,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p10(X1,X0)
      | ~ p10(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_412,c_1227]) ).

tcf(c_7742,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : p10(f13(iPr_def_10,f16(c26,X0)),f13(iPr_def_12,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_397,c_7682]) ).

tcf(c_8048,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ p5(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0)
      | ~ p10(f16(c26,iPr_def_15),c26) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1039,c_1236]) ).

tcf(c_8056,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,f13(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_15))
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7742,c_1236]) ).

tcf(c_8057,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,iPr_def_16)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8056,c_391]) ).

tcf(c_8077,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p10(X0,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8048,c_417,c_412]) ).

tcf(c_9002,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ p10(iPr_def_16,X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_8057,c_396,c_1166,c_1625,c_2694,c_8077]) ).

tcf(c_9005,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_905,c_9002]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN624-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:56:18 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 3.85/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.85/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.85/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.85/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 9 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % 
% 3.85/1.27  % clauses                               34
% 3.85/1.27  % conjectures                           26
% 3.85/1.27  % EPR                                   13
% 3.85/1.27  % Horn                                  34
% 3.85/1.27  % unary                                 18
% 3.85/1.27  % binary                                8
% 3.85/1.27  % lits                                  58
% 3.85/1.27  % lits eq                               8
% 3.85/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.85/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.85/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.85/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 3.85/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.85/1.27  % Current options:
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 3.85/1.27  % 
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.85/1.27  
% 3.85/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.85/1.28  
% 3.85/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------