↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN626-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.50s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  21 unt;   5 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  31   ~;  28   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  38   !;   0   ?;  26   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p7(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7_2) ).

fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : p6(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p6_3) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p15(X0,X1)
      | p16(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p16_8) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    p15(c22,f8(f5(c20),f9(c23,c24))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15_9) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p16(c22,X0)
      | p7(f12(f13(X0)),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7_15) ).

fof(f17,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p7(X2,X1)
      | ~ p7(X2,X0)
      | p7(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7_17) ).

fof(f24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p15(c22,f12(f13(f8(f5(c20),f9(c23,c24))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p15_24) ).

fof(f31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ p15(X2,X3)
      | ~ p7(X3,X1)
      | ~ p6(X2,X0)
      | p15(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15_31) ).

tcf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p7(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p6(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p16(X0,X1)
      | ~ p15(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    p15(c22,f8(f5(c20),f9(c23,c24))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_98,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p7(f12(f13(X0)),X0)
      | ~ p16(c22,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_100,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p7(X1,X2)
      | ~ p7(X0,X2)
      | ~ p7(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p15(c22,f12(f13(f8(f5(c20),f9(c23,c24))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_114,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p15(X3,X1)
      | ~ p15(X2,X0)
      | ~ p6(X2,X3)
      | ~ p7(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_121,plain,
    p6(c22,c22),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_608,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = f5(c20),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_609,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = f9(c23,c24),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_610,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = f8(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_611,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = f13(iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_612,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = f12(iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_615,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( p15(X3,X1)
      | ~ p15(X2,X0)
      | ~ p6(X2,X3)
      | ~ p7(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_114]) ).

tcf(c_621,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p15(c22,iPr_def_14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_609,c_608,c_610,c_611,c_612]) ).

tcf(c_627,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( p7(X1,X2)
      | ~ p7(X0,X2)
      | ~ p7(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).

tcf(c_629,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p7(f12(f13(X0)),X0)
      | ~ p16(c22,X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_98]) ).

tcf(c_634,negated_conjecture,
    p15(c22,iPr_def_12),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92]) ).

tcf(c_635,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p16(X0,X1)
      | ~ p15(X0,X1) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_91]) ).

tcf(c_639,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : p7(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85]) ).

tcf(c_1345,plain,
    p16(c22,iPr_def_12),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_634,c_635]) ).

tcf(c_1351,plain,
    ( p7(f12(iPr_def_13),iPr_def_12)
    | ~ p16(c22,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_611,c_629]) ).

tcf(c_1352,plain,
    ( p7(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12)
    | ~ p16(c22,iPr_def_12) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1351,c_612]) ).

tcf(c_1353,plain,
    p7(iPr_def_14,iPr_def_12),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1352,c_1345]) ).

tcf(c_1452,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p7(iPr_def_12,X0)
      | ~ p7(iPr_def_14,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1353,c_627]) ).

tcf(c_1803,plain,
    p7(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_639,c_1452]) ).

tcf(c_1813,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( p15(X1,iPr_def_14)
      | ~ p15(X0,iPr_def_12)
      | ~ p6(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1803,c_615]) ).

tcf(c_1833,plain,
    ( p15(c22,iPr_def_14)
    | ~ p15(c22,iPr_def_12)
    | ~ p6(c22,c22) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1813]) ).

tcf(c_1834,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1833,c_634,c_621,c_121]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN626-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:55:02 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.44  % Proving...
% 2.50/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.50/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.50/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 7 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % 
% 2.50/1.29  % clauses                               33
% 2.50/1.29  % conjectures                           28
% 2.50/1.29  % EPR                                   20
% 2.50/1.29  % Horn                                  32
% 2.50/1.29  % unary                                 12
% 2.50/1.29  % binary                                6
% 2.50/1.29  % lits                                  75
% 2.50/1.29  % lits eq                               5
% 2.50/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.50/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.50/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.50/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.50/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ 
% 2.50/1.29  % Current options:
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.50/1.29  % 
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.50/1.29  
% 2.50/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------