%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SYN638-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:48:35 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_p22_41,negated_conjecture,
~ p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p22_41) ).
cnf(p4_4,negated_conjecture,
p4(X5,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_4) ).
cnf(p22_28,negated_conjecture,
( p22(X97,X99)
| ~ p4(X100,X97)
| ~ p4(X98,X99)
| ~ p22(X100,X98) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22_28) ).
cnf(p22_40,negated_conjecture,
p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22_40) ).
cnf(c58,plain,
( p22(X216,X215)
| ~ p4(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c27))),X216)
| ~ p4(f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27))),X215) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p22_40,p22_28]) ).
cnf(p4_12,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f16(X14),f16(X15))
| ~ p4(X14,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_12) ).
cnf(p4_32,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f17(X125,X126),f17(X124,X123))
| ~ p4(X125,X124)
| ~ p4(X126,X123) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_32) ).
cnf(p4_39,negated_conjecture,
p4(f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X169,c27),f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X169,c29)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_39) ).
cnf(c56,plain,
( p4(f17(X205,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X206,c27)),f17(X204,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X206,c29)))
| ~ p4(X205,X204) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p4_39,p4_32]) ).
cnf(c128,plain,
p4(f17(X210,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X209,c27)),f17(X210,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X209,c29))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c56,p4_4]) ).
cnf(c133,plain,
p4(f16(f17(X287,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X288,c27))),f16(f17(X287,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),X288,c29)))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c128,p4_12]) ).
cnf(c294,plain,
( p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),X289)
| ~ p4(f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27))),X289) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c133,c58]) ).
cnf(c298,plain,
p22(f16(f17(c27,f5(f8(f11(c25),f9(f10(c25),c28)),c26,c29))),f16(f17(c27,f5(c25,c26,c27)))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c294,p4_4]) ).
cnf(c311,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c298,not_p22_41]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN638-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 20:18:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.54/0.72 % Version: 1.5
% 0.54/0.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.54/0.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.72
% 0.54/0.72 % Initial clauses : 41
% 0.54/0.72 % Processed clauses : 103
% 0.54/0.72 % Factors computed : 8
% 0.54/0.72 % Resolvents computed: 304
% 0.54/0.72 % Tautologies deleted: 1
% 0.54/0.72 % Forward subsumed : 53
% 0.54/0.72 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.54/0.72 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.54/0.72 % User time : 0.341 s
% 0.54/0.72 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.54/0.72 % Total time : 0.356 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------