↑ Up

CARINE---0.734.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN655-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:06:16 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.33s
% Output   : Refutation 7.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28801/SYN/SYN655-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 55] [nf = 0] [nu = 25] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 467] [nf = 28] [nu = 199] [ut = 39]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3038] [nf = 276] [nu = 1246] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 38553] [nf = 1282] [nu = 20662] [ut = 263]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 325961] [nf = 13828] [nu = 174995] [ut = 349]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% +================================================+
% |                                                |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% |                                                |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~p3_2(f11_6(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4,x5),f4_1(x6))
% B3: p3_2(x0,x0)
% B8: p9_2(x0,x0)
% B9: ~p9_2(c22_0(),c23_0())
% B10: p21_2(f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0()),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()))
% B19: ~p21_2(f11_6(x2,x3,x6,x7,x0,x4),x5) | p9_2(x0,f15_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x0))
% B35: ~p9_2(x2,x1) | ~p9_2(x2,x0) | p9_2(x0,x1)
% B36: ~p21_2(x2,x3) | ~p3_2(x3,x1) | ~p3_2(x2,x0) | p21_2(x0,x1)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U3: < d0 v2 dv1 f0 c0 t2 td1 b nc > p3_2(x0,x0)
% U10: < d0 v0 dv0 f2 c12 t14 td2 b nc > p21_2(f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0()),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()))
% U17: < d1 v1 dv1 f2 c13 t16 td3 > p9_2(c22_0(),f15_8(x0,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()))
% U27: < d2 v1 dv1 f2 c13 t16 td3 > p9_2(f15_8(x0,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()),c22_0())
% U29: < d2 v1 dv1 f2 c13 t16 td3 > ~p9_2(f15_8(x0,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()),c23_0())
% U45: < d3 v11 dv11 f4 c13 t28 td4 > ~p3_2(f11_6(x0,x1,x2,x3,c23_0(),x4),f11_6(x5,x6,x7,x8,f15_8(x9,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()),x10))
% U349: < d6 v1 dv1 f1 c6 t8 td2 > ~p3_2(x0,f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0()))
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U3:
% p3_2(x0,x0) ....... U3
% Derivation of unit clause U10:
% p21_2(f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0()),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0())) ....... U10
% Derivation of unit clause U17:
% p21_2(f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0()),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0())) ....... B10
% ~p21_2(f11_6(x2,x3,x6,x7,x0,x4),x5) | p9_2(x0,f15_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x0)) ....... B19
%  p9_2(c22_0(), f15_8(x0, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0())) ....... R1 [B10:L0, B19:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U27:
% p9_2(x0,x0) ....... B8
% ~p9_2(x2,x1) | ~p9_2(x2,x0) | p9_2(x0,x1) ....... B35
%  ~p9_2(x0, x1) | p9_2(x1, x0) ....... R1 [B8:L0, B35:L0]
%  p9_2(c22_0(),f15_8(x0,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0())) ....... U17
%   p9_2(f15_8(x0, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), c22_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U17:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U29:
% ~p9_2(c22_0(),c23_0()) ....... B9
% ~p9_2(x2,x1) | ~p9_2(x2,x0) | p9_2(x0,x1) ....... B35
%  ~p9_2(x0, c23_0()) | ~p9_2(x0, c22_0()) ....... R1 [B9:L0, B35:L2]
%  p9_2(f15_8(x0,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()),c22_0()) ....... U27
%   ~p9_2(f15_8(x0, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), c23_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U27:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U45:
% p9_2(x0,x0) ....... B8
% ~p9_2(x2,x1) | ~p9_2(x2,x0) | p9_2(x0,x1) ....... B35
%  ~p9_2(x0, x1) | p9_2(x1, x0) ....... R1 [B8:L0, B35:L0]
%  ~p3_2(f11_6(x2,x3,x4,x5,x0,x6),f11_6(x7,x8,x9,x10,x1,x11)) | p9_2(x0,x1) ....... B16
%   p9_2(x0, x1) | ~p3_2(f11_6(x2, x3, x4, x5, x1, x6), f11_6(x7, x8, x9, x10, x0, x11)) ....... R2 [R1:L0, B16:L1]
%   ~p9_2(f15_8(x0,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()),c23_0()) ....... U29
%    ~p3_2(f11_6(x0, x1, x2, x3, c23_0(), x4), f11_6(x5, x6, x7, x8, f15_8(x9, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), x10)) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U29:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U349:
% p3_2(x0,x0) ....... B3
% ~p21_2(x2,x3) | ~p3_2(x3,x1) | ~p3_2(x2,x0) | p21_2(x0,x1) ....... B36
%  ~p21_2(x0, x1) | ~p3_2(x0, x2) | p21_2(x2, x1) ....... R1 [B3:L0, B36:L1]
%  p21_2(f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0()),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0())) ....... U10
%   ~p3_2(f11_6(c24_0(), c25_0(), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0(), c28_0()), x0) | p21_2(x0, f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U10:L0]
%   ~p3_2(x2,x1) | ~p3_2(x2,x0) | p3_2(x0,x1) ....... B30
%    p21_2(x0, f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0())) | ~p3_2(x1, x0) | ~p3_2(x1, f11_6(c24_0(), c25_0(), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0(), c28_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L0, B30:L2]
%     p21_2(f11_6(c24_0(), c25_0(), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0(), c28_0()), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0())) | ~p3_2(x0, f11_6(c24_0(), c25_0(), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0(), c28_0())) ....... R4 [R3:L2, R3:L1]
%     ~p21_2(f11_6(x2,x3,x5,x6,x7,x4),x0) | p3_2(x0,f11_6(f19_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x0,x5,x6,x7),f18_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x0,x5,x6,x7),f17_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x0,x5,x6,x7),f16_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x0,x5,x6,x7),f15_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x0,x5,x6,x7),f14_8(x1,x2,x3,x4,x0,x5,x6,x7))) ....... B47
%      ~p3_2(x0, f11_6(c24_0(), c25_0(), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0(), c28_0())) | p3_2(f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), f11_6(f19_8(x1, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), f18_8(x1, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), f17_8(x1, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), f16_8(x1, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), f15_8(x1, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()), f14_8(x1, c24_0(), c25_0(), c28_0(), f11_6(c29_0(), c30_0(), c31_0(), c32_0(), c23_0(), c33_0()), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0()))) ....... R5 [R4:L0, B47:L0]
%      ~p3_2(f11_6(x0,x1,x2,x3,c23_0(),x4),f11_6(x5,x6,x7,x8,f15_8(x9,c24_0(),c25_0(),c28_0(),f11_6(c29_0(),c30_0(),c31_0(),c32_0(),c23_0(),c33_0()),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0()),x10)) ....... U45
%       ~p3_2(x0, f11_6(c24_0(), c25_0(), c26_0(), c27_0(), c22_0(), c28_0())) ....... R6 [R5:L1, U45:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% ~p3_2(x0,f11_6(c24_0(),c25_0(),c26_0(),c27_0(),c22_0(),c28_0())) ....... U349
% p3_2(x0,x0) ....... U3
%  [] ....... R1 [U349:L0, U3:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 663698
% 	resolvents: 640995	factors: 22703
% Number of unit clauses generated: 346207
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 52.16
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 12	[1] = 9		[2] = 18	[3] = 27	
% [4] = 197	[5] = 86	[6] = 1		
% Total = 350
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 346207	[2] = 276937	[3] = 40514	[4] = 40	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p10_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [1] p12_2		(+)7	(-)0
% [2] p21_2		(+)85	(-)6
% [3] p2_2		(+)160	(-)0
% [4] p3_2		(+)47	(-)25
% [5] p5_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [6] p6_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [7] p7_2		(+)1	(-)0
% [8] p8_2		(+)6	(-)0
% [9] p9_2		(+)6	(-)4
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)315	(-)35
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 350
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 641942
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 16572
% Number of successful unifications: 663712
% Number of unification failures: 7392820
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 1662
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1484957
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1719183
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 514083
% Max entries in substitution set: 26
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 305185
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 49906
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 56
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3797
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 9853
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 496000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.01
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.39
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 66
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 8056532
% ConstructUnitClause() = 305523
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.63 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 94814
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 7 secs
% CPU time: 7.33 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------