↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1
% Problem  : SYN660-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  7 07:40:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 5.80s 1.72s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.15  % Problem  : SYN660-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.10/0.16  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.38  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.38  % DateTime : Thu May  7 13:47:00 EDT 2026
% 0.20/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.38  SPASS-SCL-FOL version:
% 0.27/0.50  SPASS-SCL-FOL 0.1 (595c0c7b1) [parallel mode]
% 5.80/1.72  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_normal -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.80/1.72  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_1 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.80/1.72  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_2 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.80/1.72  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_3 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.80/1.72  Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_lmodel_grow -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.80/1.72  Execution resolution_3 ended with status: unsatisfiable
% 5.80/1.72  Used heuristic: resolution_3
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72   Input Clauses:
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72   Predicates: p22 p10 p7 p6 p3 p2 p19 p18 p14 p12 p25 p26 p23 p27 p24 
% 5.80/1.72   Fol Constants: c28 c37 c34 c33 c36 c32 c31 c29 c30 c35 
% 5.80/1.72   Fol Functions: f9 f8 f20 f5 f4 f17 f16 f11 f21 f13 f15 
% 5.80/1.72   Problem Properties:
% 5.80/1.72   This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72   After reduction:  Problem Properties:
% 5.80/1.72   This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72   Reduced Input Clauses:
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72   Most General Atoms: p22(x1) p6(x1,x2) p19(x1,x2) p14(x1,x2) p2(x2,x3) p27(x3,x1) p12(x2,x3) p24(x1,x3) p25(x3,x1) p10(x2,x3) p26(x1,x3) p7(x2,x3) p3(x2,x3) p18(x4,x5) p23(x5,x3,x1) 
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72  === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 54 atoms initially, heuristics mode: resolution_3 ===
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 55:2:1:[26.2,11.1]:Top: p10(c37,x0) -> p10(x0,c34)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 56:3:2:[37.2,12.1]:TopTop: p2(c36,x0),p2(c33,x1) -> p25(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 57:2:1:[27.2,16.1]:Top: p7(f8(c29),x0) -> p7(x0,c30)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 58:2:1:[30.2,15.1]:Top: p2(c32,x0) -> p2(x0,f9(c31))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 60:2:2:[29.2,5.1]:TopTop: p3(x0,x1) -> p3(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 61:2:2:[30.2,6.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 119
% 5.80/1.72  === Restarting.
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 62:3:2:[38.2,17.1]:TopTop: p19(f20(c28,c35),x0),p10(c34,x1) -> p26(x0,x1)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 63:2:2:[31.2,7.1]:TopTop: p19(x0,x1) -> p19(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 64:2:2:[33.2,9.1]:TopTop: p14(x0,x1) -> p14(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 65:2:2:[34.2,10.1]:TopTop: p12(x0,x1) -> p12(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 66:2:2:[48.3,19.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,f16(x0,x1)),p2(x1,f9(f17(c31))) -> 
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 67:3:2:[37.3,39.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p25(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p25(f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))),x1)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 68:3:2:[37.1,39.1]:TopTop: p25(x0,f11(f4(c32),c34)),p2(x0,x1) -> p25(x1,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 69:2:1:[30.1,39.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 70:3:2:[37.3,40.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p25(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p25(f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))),x1)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 71:3:2:[37.1,40.1]:TopTop: p25(x0,f11(f4(c32),c34)),p2(x0,x1) -> p25(x1,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 72:2:1:[30.1,40.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 73:3:2:[35.2,41.1]:TopTop: p2(f11(f4(f21(c33,f9(f17(c31)))),c35),x0),p2(f11(f4(c33),c35),x1) -> p27(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 177
% 5.80/1.72  === Restarting.
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 55:2:1:[26.2,11.1]:Top: p10(c37,x0) -> p10(x0,c34) {x0 -> c28}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 74:3:2:[55.1,26.3]:TopTop: p10(x0,c37),p10(x0,x1) -> p10(x1,c34)
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0) {x0 -> c28, x1 -> f8(c29)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 75:2:1:[59.2,57.1]:Top: p7(x0,f8(c29)) -> p7(x0,c30)
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0) {x0 -> f8(c29), x1 -> c30}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 76:1:0:[59.1,16.1]::  -> p7(c30,f8(c29))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 77:2:1:[27.1,21.2,16.1]:Top: p6(c29,x0) -> p7(f8(x0),c30)
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 63:2:2:[31.2,7.1]:TopTop: p19(x0,x1) -> p19(x1,x0) {x0 -> c28, x1 -> f20(c28,c35)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 78:3:2:[63.2,62.1]:TopTop: p19(x0,f20(c28,c35)),p10(c34,x1) -> p26(x0,x1)
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 66:2:2:[48.3,19.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,f16(x0,x1)),p2(x1,f9(f17(c31))) ->  {x0 -> c28, x1 -> f9(c28)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 79:2:2:[66.2,24.2]:TopTop: p2(x0,f16(x0,f9(x1))),p2(x1,f17(c31)) -> 
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 80:2:1:[38.1,7.1,17.1]:Top: p10(c34,x0) -> p26(f20(c28,c35),x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 81:4:2:[30.1,50.3,61.1]:TopTop: p2(f11(f4(x0),c34),x1),p25(x0,c36),p25(c32,x0) -> p2(x1,f11(f4(c32),c34))
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 61:2:2:[30.2,6.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0) {x0 -> c28, x1 -> f11(f4(f21(c33,f9(f17(c31)))),c35)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 82:3:2:[61.2,73.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,f11(f4(f21(c33,f9(f17(c31)))),c35)),p2(f11(f4(c33),c35),x1) -> p27(x1,x0)
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 69:2:1:[30.1,39.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) {x0 -> f11(f4(c33),c34)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 83:1:0:[69.2,19.1]:: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c33),c34)) -> 
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 84:3:2:[30.1,69.2,61.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x1,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 85:3:2:[30.1,72.2,61.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x1,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 72:2:1:[30.1,40.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) {x0 -> f11(f4(c36),c34)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 86:1:0:[72.2,19.1]:: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c34)) -> 
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 87:6:5:[35.1,39.1,35.2,61.2,84.3]:TopTopTopTopTop: p27(x0,f11(f4(c32),c34)),p2(x0,x1),p2(x1,x2),p2(x3,x4),p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x3) -> p27(x2,x4)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 88:3:2:[35.1,39.1]:TopTop: p27(x0,f11(f4(c32),c34)),p2(x0,x1) -> p27(x1,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 89:3:2:[35.3,39.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p27(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p27(f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))),x1)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 90:3:2:[35.1,40.1]:TopTop: p27(x0,f11(f4(c32),c34)),p2(x0,x1) -> p27(x1,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 91:3:2:[35.3,40.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p27(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p27(f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))),x1)
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 92:2:1:[35.1,6.1,41.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c33),c35),x0) -> p27(x0,f11(f4(f21(c33,f9(f17(c31)))),c35))
% 5.80/1.72  === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 218
% 5.80/1.72  === Restarting.
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0) {x0 -> f8(c28), x1 -> c30}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 93:2:1:[59.1,77.2]:Top: p6(c29,x0) -> p7(c30,f8(x0))
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 81:4:2:[30.1,50.3,61.1]:TopTop: p2(f11(f4(x0),c34),x1),p25(x0,c36),p25(c32,x0) -> p2(x1,f11(f4(c32),c34)) {x0 -> c28, x1 -> c28}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 94:4:2:[81.1,61.2]:TopTop: p25(x0,c36),p25(c32,x0),p2(x1,f11(f4(x0),c34)) -> p2(x1,f11(f4(c32),c34))
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 61:2:2:[30.2,6.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0) {x0 -> f11(f4(c32),c34), x1 -> f11(c28,c28)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 95:9:6:[61.1,47.3,35.1,87.1,61.2,94.4]:TopTopTopTopTopTop: p10(c34,x0),p3(f4(c32),x1),p27(x2,f11(x1,x0)),p2(x2,x3),p2(x3,x4),p25(x5,c36),p25(c32,x5),p2(x3,f11(f4(x5),c34)) -> p27(x3,x4)
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 61:2:2:[30.2,6.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0) {x0 -> f11(f4(c32),c34), x1 -> f11(c28,c28)}
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 96:3:4:[61.1,47.3]:TopTopTopTop: p10(x0,x1),p3(x2,x3) -> p2(f11(x3,x1),f11(x2,x0))
% 5.80/1.72  === Backtracking. Learning clause 97:2:0:[47.3,83.1]:: p10(c34,c34),p3(f4(c32),f4(c33)) -> 
% 5.80/1.72  === Conflict found: 61:2:2:[30.2,6.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0) {x0 -> f11(f4(c33),c34), x1 -> f11(f4(c32),c34)}
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72  SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72  SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 5.80/1.72  Number of learned clauses: 43
% 5.80/1.72  Number of propagations: 1504
% 5.80/1.72  Number of decisions: 1225
% 5.80/1.72  Number of resolutions: 62
% 5.80/1.72  Number of condensations: 0
% 5.80/1.72  Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 5.80/1.72  Number of input literals (deduplicated): 57
% 5.80/1.72  Number of grows: 3
% 5.80/1.72  Number of considered ground atoms: 218
% 5.80/1.72  
% 5.80/1.72   Needed:       0:00:01.08
% 5.80/1.72  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------