%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS-SCL---0.1
% Problem : SYN665-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 7 07:40:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.82s 1.37s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.15 % Problem : SYN665-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.16 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.21/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.21/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.38 % DateTime : Thu May 7 13:46:33 EDT 2026
% 0.21/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.38 SPASS-SCL-FOL version:
% 0.28/0.50 SPASS-SCL-FOL 0.1 (595c0c7b1) [parallel mode]
% 3.82/1.37 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_normal -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.37 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_1 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.37 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_2 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.37 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_resolution_3 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.37 Starting: ./SPASS-SCL-FOL --heuristics_lmodel_grow -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.37 Execution resolution_1 ended with status: unsatisfiable
% 3.82/1.37 Used heuristic: resolution_1
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 Input Clauses:
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 Predicates: p22 p10 p7 p6 p3 p20 p2 p19 p14 p12 p25 p26 p23 p27 p24
% 3.82/1.37 Fol Constants: c28 c35 c34 c36 c33 c32 c31 c29 c30 c37
% 3.82/1.37 Fol Functions: f9 f8 f21 f5 f4 f17 f16 f11 f18 f13 f15
% 3.82/1.37 Problem Properties:
% 3.82/1.37 This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 After reduction: Problem Properties:
% 3.82/1.37 This is a full first-order problem without equality.
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 Reduced Input Clauses:
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 Most General Atoms: p22(x1) p6(x1,x2) p20(x1,x2) p14(x1,x2) p2(x2,x3) p27(x3,x1) p12(x2,x3) p24(x1,x3) p25(x3,x1) p10(x2,x3) p26(x1,x3) p7(x2,x3) p3(x2,x3) p19(x4,x5) p23(x5,x3,x1)
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 54 atoms initially, heuristics mode: resolution_1 ===
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 55:2:1:[26.2,11.1]:Top: p10(c35,x0) -> p10(x0,c34)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 56:3:2:[37.2,12.1]:TopTop: p2(c33,x0),p2(c36,x1) -> p25(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 57:2:1:[27.2,16.1]:Top: p7(f8(c29),x0) -> p7(x0,c30)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 58:2:1:[31.2,15.1]:Top: p2(c32,x0) -> p2(x0,f9(c31))
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 60:2:2:[29.2,5.1]:TopTop: p3(x0,x1) -> p3(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 61:2:2:[31.2,7.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 119
% 3.82/1.37 === Restarting.
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 62:2:2:[33.2,9.1]:TopTop: p14(x0,x1) -> p14(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 63:2:2:[47.3,19.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,f16(x0,x1)),p2(x1,f9(f17(c31))) ->
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 64:3:2:[37.3,39.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1),p25(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p25(f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))),x1)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 65:3:2:[37.1,39.1]:TopTop: p25(x0,f11(f4(c32),c34)),p2(x0,x1) -> p25(x1,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 66:2:1:[31.1,39.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 3.82/1.37 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 154
% 3.82/1.37 === Restarting.
% 3.82/1.37 === Conflict found: 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0) {x0 -> c28, x1 -> f8(c29)}
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 67:2:1:[59.2,57.1]:Top: p7(x0,f8(c29)) -> p7(x0,c30)
% 3.82/1.37 === Conflict found: 59:2:2:[27.2,3.1]:TopTop: p7(x0,x1) -> p7(x1,x0) {x0 -> f8(c29), x1 -> c30}
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 68:1:0:[59.1,16.1]:: -> p7(c30,f8(c29))
% 3.82/1.37 === Conflict found: 66:2:1:[31.1,39.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c33),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) {x0 -> f11(f4(c33),c34)}
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 69:1:0:[66.2,19.1]:: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c33),c34)) ->
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 70:2:1:[31.1,40.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31))))
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 71:3:2:[37.2,42.1]:TopTop: p2(f11(f4(f18(c33,f9(f17(c31)))),c35),x0),p2(f11(f4(c33),c35),x1) -> p25(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 176
% 3.82/1.37 === Restarting.
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 72:3:2:[37.2,13.1]:TopTop: p2(c36,x0),p2(c32,x1) -> p25(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 73:2:1:[27.2,68.1]:Top: p7(c30,x0) -> p7(x0,f8(c29))
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 74:3:2:[27.1,21.2,59.2,59.1,73.2]:TopTop: p6(c29,x0),p7(c30,x1) -> p7(x1,f8(x0))
% 3.82/1.37 === Conflict found: 63:2:2:[47.3,19.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,f16(x0,x1)),p2(x1,f9(f17(c31))) -> {x0 -> c28, x1 -> f9(c28)}
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 75:2:2:[63.2,24.2]:TopTop: p2(x0,f16(x0,f9(x1))),p2(x1,f17(c31)) ->
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 76:2:2:[30.2,6.1]:TopTop: p20(x0,x1) -> p20(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 77:2:2:[34.2,10.1]:TopTop: p12(x0,x1) -> p12(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 78:7:5:[35.3,49.3,35.2]:TopTopTopTopTop: p2(x0,x1),p27(f11(f4(x2),c34),x0),p25(x2,c33),p25(c32,x2),p2(x1,x3),p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x4) -> p27(x4,x3)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 79:4:5:[31.2,46.3,61.2]:TopTopTopTopTop: p10(x0,x1),p3(x2,x3),p2(x4,f11(x2,x0)) -> p2(x4,f11(x3,x1))
% 3.82/1.37 === Conflict found: 70:2:1:[31.1,40.1,61.1]:Top: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),x0) -> p2(x0,f16(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) {x0 -> f11(f4(c36),c34)}
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 80:1:0:[70.2,19.1]:: p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c34)) ->
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 81:3:2:[35.2,41.1]:TopTop: p2(f11(f4(f18(c36,f9(f17(c31)))),c37),x0),p2(f11(f4(c36),c37),x1) -> p27(x1,x0)
% 3.82/1.37 === Clause set with instances from active satisfied. Growing active. New size: 209
% 3.82/1.37 === Restarting.
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 82:5:6:[35.3,46.3]:TopTopTopTopTopTop: p2(x0,x1),p27(f11(x2,x3),x0),p10(x3,x4),p3(x2,x5) -> p27(f11(x5,x4),x1)
% 3.82/1.37 === Backtracking. Learning clause 83:5:3:[37.1,50.3]:TopTopTop: p25(x0,f11(f4(x1),c34)),p2(x0,x2),p25(x1,c36),p25(c32,x1) -> p25(x2,f11(f4(c32),c34))
% 3.82/1.37 === Conflict found: 61:2:2:[31.2,7.1]:TopTop: p2(x0,x1) -> p2(x1,x0) {x0 -> f11(f4(c36),c34), x1 -> f11(f4(c32),c34)}
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 3.82/1.37 Number of learned clauses: 29
% 3.82/1.37 Number of propagations: 1191
% 3.82/1.37 Number of decisions: 912
% 3.82/1.37 Number of resolutions: 40
% 3.82/1.37 Number of condensations: 0
% 3.82/1.37 Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 3.82/1.37 Number of input literals (deduplicated): 57
% 3.82/1.37 Number of grows: 4
% 3.82/1.37 Number of considered ground atoms: 209
% 3.82/1.37
% 3.82/1.37 Needed: 0:00:00.73
% 3.82/1.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------