↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN669-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X3,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_30) ).

cnf(p2_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p25(c32,X1)
    | ~ p25(X1,c33)
    | p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_49) ).

cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).

cnf(p25_12,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c36,c33),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_12) ).

cnf(p25_13,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c32,c36),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_13) ).

cnf(p2_39,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_39) ).

cnf(not_p2_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_18) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X3,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p25(c32,X1)
    | ~ p25(X1,c33)
    | p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X3,X2)
    | ~ p2(X3,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    p2_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p25(c32,X1)
    | ~ p25(X1,c33)
    | p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c36,c33),
    p25_12 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    p25(c32,c36),
    p25_13 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
    p2_39 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X2,X1)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f11(f4(c36),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p2_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),X1)
    | p2(X1,f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c34)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN669-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:11:36 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 632105 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 632111 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 54
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 54
% 0.10/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 54
% 0.10/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 215
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 0.10/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 205
% 0.10/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 720
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 637
% 0.10/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 720
% 0.10/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 85
% 0.10/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 14
% 0.10/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 151
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 74
% 0.10/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.10/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 75
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 529
% 0.10/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 916
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 0.10/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1258
% 0.10/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1095
% 0.10/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.10/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 69
% 0.10/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 13786
% 0.10/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 155
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3688 pages
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.44  % User time                : 0.046 s
% 0.10/0.44  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Total time               : 0.061 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------