%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN681-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_31,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X3,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_31) ).
cnf(p2_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p25(c32,X1)
| ~ p25(X1,c33)
| p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_50) ).
cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_7) ).
cnf(p25_12,negated_conjecture,
p25(c36,c33),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_12) ).
cnf(p25_13,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c36),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p25_13) ).
cnf(p2_40,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_40) ).
cnf(not_p2_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_19) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X3,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p25(c32,X1)
| ~ p25(X1,c33)
| p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p2_50]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X3,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p25(c32,X1)
| ~ p25(X1,c33)
| p2(f11(f4(X1),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p25(c36,c33),
p25_12 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p25(c32,c36),
p25_13 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))),
p2_40 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X2,X1)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c36),c34),f11(f4(c32),c34)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p2_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),X1)
| p2(X1,f18(f11(f4(c36),c34),f9(f17(c31)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c32),c34),f11(f4(c36),c34)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(X1,f18(X1,f9(f17(c31)))),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SYN681-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:10:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 944692 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 944697 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 55
% 0.15/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Initial clauses : 55
% 0.15/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 55
% 0.15/0.46 % Processed clauses : 226
% 0.15/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 16
% 0.15/0.46 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.15/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 209
% 0.15/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Generated clauses : 612
% 0.15/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 536
% 0.15/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Paramodulations : 612
% 0.15/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 85
% 0.15/0.46 % ...of those cached : 12
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 154
% 0.15/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 72
% 0.15/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 80
% 0.15/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 420
% 0.15/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 792
% 0.15/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 55
% 0.15/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1339
% 0.15/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1168
% 0.15/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.15/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 37
% 0.15/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11028
% 0.15/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 155
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.46 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.46 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.15/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.15/0.46
% 0.15/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46 % User time : 0.068 s
% 0.15/0.46 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.46 % Total time : 0.084 s
% 0.15/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------