%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SYN686-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:13:19 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 1.77s 0.59s % Output : CNFRefutation 1.77s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN686-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 05:22:10 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.13/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.36 # % 0.13/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.36 # Number of axioms: 58 Number of unprocessed: 58 % 0.13/0.36 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.36 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.36 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 58 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 58 conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 58 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 22 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.37 # 58 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 36 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 22 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 1.77/0.59 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 1.77/0.59 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.77/0.59 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.77/0.59 # Begin clausification derivation % 1.77/0.59 % 1.77/0.59 # End clausification derivation % 1.77/0.59 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (p3(c36,f7(c33,c34)))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (p3(c42,f7(c33,c34)))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_77, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(c32,c36),c37))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (p9(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (p6(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (p4(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (p28(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (p26(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_78, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(c32,f7(c33,c34)),c35))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_79, negated_conjecture, (p30(f10(f12(c39,c36),c37),c41))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (p24(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (p22(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (p20(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (p18(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_80, negated_conjecture, (~p30(f10(f12(c39,f7(c33,c34)),c35),c41))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_81, negated_conjecture, (p11(X1,X2)|~p11(X3,X2)|~p11(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_112, negated_conjecture, (p30(f10(f12(c39,X1),f5(c32,X1)),f5(c32,f7(c40,X1)))|~p31(f15(c38,X1),c36))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_82, negated_conjecture, (p9(X1,X2)|~p9(X3,X2)|~p9(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_83, negated_conjecture, (p8(X1,X2)|~p8(X3,X2)|~p8(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (p6(X1,X2)|~p6(X3,X2)|~p6(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_85, negated_conjecture, (p4(X1,X2)|~p4(X3,X2)|~p4(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_86, negated_conjecture, (p3(X1,X2)|~p3(X3,X2)|~p3(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_87, negated_conjecture, (p28(X1,X2)|~p28(X3,X2)|~p28(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_88, negated_conjecture, (p26(X1,X2)|~p26(X3,X2)|~p26(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_89, negated_conjecture, (p24(X1,X2)|~p24(X3,X2)|~p24(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_90, negated_conjecture, (p22(X1,X2)|~p22(X3,X2)|~p22(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_91, negated_conjecture, (p20(X1,X2)|~p20(X3,X2)|~p20(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_92, negated_conjecture, (p2(X1,X2)|~p2(X3,X2)|~p2(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_93, negated_conjecture, (p18(X1,X2)|~p18(X3,X2)|~p18(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_94, negated_conjecture, (p16(X1,X2)|~p16(X3,X2)|~p16(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_95, negated_conjecture, (p14(X1,X2)|~p14(X3,X2)|~p14(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (p13(X1,X2)|~p13(X3,X2)|~p13(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (p9(f10(X1,X2),f10(X3,X4))|~p4(X2,X4)|~p8(X1,X3))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (p30(X1,X2)|~p30(X3,X4)|~p4(X4,X2)|~p9(X3,X1))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (p31(X1,X2)|~p31(X3,X4)|~p14(X3,X1)|~p3(X4,X2))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_109, negated_conjecture, (p8(f12(X1,X2),f12(X3,X4))|~p3(X2,X4)|~p11(X1,X3))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_110, negated_conjecture, (p8(f23(X1,X2),f23(X3,X4))|~p22(X1,X3)|~p11(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_108, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))|~p2(X1,X3)|~p3(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_113, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(f27(f29(c45,X1),X2),f7(c33,c34)),X1)|~p30(f10(f23(f25(c43,c36),c39),X1),X2))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_111, negated_conjecture, (p4(f5(f27(f29(c45,X1),X2),c36),X2)|~p30(f10(f23(f25(c43,c36),c39),X1),X2))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_107, negated_conjecture, (p3(f7(X1,X2),f7(X3,X4))|~p3(X2,X4)|~p6(X1,X3))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_106, negated_conjecture, (p3(f17(X1,X2),f17(X3,X4))|~p16(X1,X3)|~p2(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_105, negated_conjecture, (p26(f29(X1,X2),f29(X3,X4))|~p28(X1,X3)|~p4(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_104, negated_conjecture, (p22(f25(X1,X2),f25(X3,X4))|~p24(X1,X3)|~p3(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_103, negated_conjecture, (p2(f27(X1,X2),f27(X3,X4))|~p26(X1,X3)|~p4(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_102, negated_conjecture, (p18(f21(X1,X2),f21(X3,X4))|~p20(X1,X3)|~p4(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_101, negated_conjecture, (p16(f19(X1,X2),f19(X3,X4))|~p18(X1,X3)|~p4(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (p14(f15(X1,X2),f15(X3,X4))|~p13(X1,X3)|~p3(X2,X4))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_114, negated_conjecture, (p31(f15(c38,f17(f19(f21(c44,X1),X2),X3)),c36)|p30(f10(f23(f25(c43,c36),c39),X1),X2)|~p4(f5(X3,f7(c33,c34)),X1)|~p4(f5(X3,c36),X2))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_115, negated_conjecture, (p30(f10(f12(c39,X1),f5(f27(f29(c45,X2),X3),X1)),f5(f27(f29(c45,X2),X3),f7(c40,X1)))|~p31(f15(c38,X1),c36)|~p30(f10(f23(f25(c43,c36),c39),X2),X3))). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_116, negated_conjecture, (p30(f10(f23(f25(c43,c36),c39),X1),X2)|~p30(f10(f12(c39,f17(f19(f21(c44,X1),X2),X3)),f5(X3,f17(f19(f21(c44,X1),X2),X3))),f5(X3,f7(c40,f17(f19(f21(c44,X1),X2),X3))))|~p4(f5(X3,f7(c33,c34)),X1)|~p4(f5(X3,c36),X2))). % 1.77/0.59 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 1.77/0.59 # Begin printing tableau % 1.77/0.59 # Found 8 steps % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_104, negated_conjecture, (p22(f25(X17,X16),f25(X17,X16))|~p24(X17,X17)|~p3(X16,X16)), inference(start_rule)). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_141, plain, (~p24(X17,X17)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_67])). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_142, plain, (~p3(X16,X16)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_64])). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_140, plain, (p22(f25(X17,X16),f25(X17,X16))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_110])). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_292, plain, (~p11(X15,X15)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_59])). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_290, plain, (p8(f23(f25(X17,X16),X15),f23(f25(X17,X16),X15))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_99])). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_347, plain, (~p4(f5(c32,f7(c33,c34)),c35)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_78])). % 1.77/0.59 cnf(i_0_346, plain, (p9(f10(f23(f25(X17,X16),X15),f5(c32,f7(c33,c34))),f10(f23(f25(X17,X16),X15),c35))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_346, ...])). % 1.77/0.59 # End printing tableau % 1.77/0.59 # SZS output end % 1.77/0.59 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 1.77/0.59 # Child (19508) has found a proof. % 1.77/0.59 % 1.77/0.59 # Proof search is over... % 1.77/0.59 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------