↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN691-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.59s 1.79s
% Output   : Refutation 1.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem  : SYN691-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.04/0.15  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:44:13 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.39  Mon Jul 11 13:44:13 2022
% 0.22/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 13465.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  list(usable).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.22/0.39  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.22/0.39  in usable.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.59/1.79  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.59/1.79  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.59/1.79  number of clauses in intial UL: 44
% 1.59/1.79  number of clauses initially in problem: 67
% 1.59/1.79  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 65
% 1.59/1.79  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 75
% 1.59/1.79  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 1.59/1.79  absolute distinct symbol count: 62
% 1.59/1.79     distinct predicate count: 22
% 1.59/1.79     distinct function count: 28
% 1.59/1.79     distinct constant count: 12
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.59/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.59/1.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.38 sec ----> 92 [binary,91.1,22.1] {+} $F.
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.59/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.59/1.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  22 [] {+} -p39(f5(c40,f10(f13(f15(c42,c43),c44),c45)),c46).
% 1.59/1.79  23 [] {+} p39(A,B)| -p39(f17(f19(f21(c47,A),C),D),B).
% 1.59/1.79  24 [] {+} p39(A,B)| -p39(C,D)| -p4(C,A)| -p22(D,B).
% 1.59/1.79  28 [] {+} p4(f5(A,B),f5(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p3(B,D).
% 1.59/1.79  41 [] {+} p39(A,B)| -p39(f5(c40,f10(f13(f15(c42,A),C),D)),B).
% 1.59/1.79  42 [] {+} p39(f5(c40,f10(f13(f15(c42,A),B),C)),D)| -p39(A,D).
% 1.59/1.79  59 [] {-} p22(A,A).
% 1.59/1.79  61 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 1.59/1.79  66 [] {-} p39(f5(c40,f7(c41,f10(f13(f15(c42,c43),c44),c45))),c46).
% 1.59/1.79  67 [] {-} p3(f7(c41,f10(f13(f15(c42,A),B),C)),f10(f13(f15(c42,f17(f19(f21(c47,A),B),C)),f26(f28(f30(c48,A),B),C)),f34(f36(f38(c49,A),B),C))).
% 1.59/1.79  72 [hyper,67,28,61] {-} p4(f5(A,f7(c41,f10(f13(f15(c42,B),C),D))),f5(A,f10(f13(f15(c42,f17(f19(f21(c47,B),C),D)),f26(f28(f30(c48,B),C),D)),f34(f36(f38(c49,B),C),D)))).
% 1.59/1.79  83 [hyper,72,24,66,59] {-} p39(f5(c40,f10(f13(f15(c42,f17(f19(f21(c47,c43),c44),c45)),f26(f28(f30(c48,c43),c44),c45)),f34(f36(f38(c49,c43),c44),c45))),c46).
% 1.59/1.79  85 [hyper,83,41] {-} p39(f17(f19(f21(c47,c43),c44),c45),c46).
% 1.59/1.79  90 [hyper,85,23] {-} p39(c43,c46).
% 1.59/1.79  91 [hyper,90,42] {-} p39(f5(c40,f10(f13(f15(c42,c43),A),B)),c46).
% 1.59/1.79  92 [binary,91.1,22.1] {+} $F.
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.59/1.79  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  ============ end of search ============
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.59/1.79  
% 1.59/1.79  Process 13465 finished Mon Jul 11 13:44:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------