↑ Up

SATCoP---0.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SYN702-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:54:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    p47(f5(c48,f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54)),c54),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_76)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    p7(c54,c54),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p7_3)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    p2(c48,c48),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_20)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ p7(c54,c54)
    | ~ p4(f5(c48,f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54)),f5(c48,f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54))))
    | ~ p47(f5(c48,f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54)),c54)
    | p47(f5(c48,f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54))),c54) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_52)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ p3(f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54),f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54)))
    | ~ p2(c48,c48)
    | p4(f5(c48,f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54)),f5(c48,f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54)))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_57)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    p3(f8(f10(c49,f13(f16(f18(c50,c51),c52),c53)),c54),f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54))),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_79)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ p47(f5(c48,f13(f16(f18(c50,f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c56,c51),c52),c53),c54)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c57,c51),c52),c53),c54))),c54)
    | p47(f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54),c54) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_73)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ~ p47(f20(f22(f24(f26(c55,c51),c52),c53),c54),c54),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p47_51)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN702-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 15:36:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % symbols: 58
% 0.13/0.35  % clauses: 79
% 0.13/0.35  % start clauses: 27
% 0.13/0.35  % iterative deepening steps: 37
% 0.13/0.35  % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.13/0.35  % literal attempts: 11931
% 0.13/0.35  % depth failures: 7091
% 0.13/0.35  % regularity failures: 23
% 0.13/0.35  % tautology failures: 1466
% 0.13/0.35  % reductions: 2001
% 0.13/0.35  % extensions: 9075
% 0.13/0.35  % SAT variables: 1743
% 0.13/0.35  % SAT clauses: 2240
% 0.13/0.35  % WalkSAT solutions: 2235
% 0.13/0.35  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.35  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------