%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN710-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 10.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p33_80,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),X3)
| ~ p33(f11(c46,X3),X2)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p33_80) ).
cnf(p33_50,negated_conjecture,
p33(f11(c46,f13(f16(c48,c49),c50)),f9(c47,c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p33_50) ).
cnf(p33_75,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),X3)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),f13(f16(c48,X2),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p33_75) ).
cnf(p33_73,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,f20(f22(c52,X1),X2)),X2)
| p33(f11(c46,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p33_73) ).
cnf(not_p33_25,negated_conjecture,
~ p33(f11(c46,c50),f9(c47,c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p33_25) ).
cnf(p33_72,negated_conjecture,
( p33(f18(c51,f20(f22(c52,X1),X2)),X1)
| p33(f11(c46,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p33_72) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),X3)
| ~ p33(f11(c46,X3),X2)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p33_80]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),X3)
| ~ p33(f11(c46,X3),X2)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),X2) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p33(f11(c46,f13(f16(c48,c49),c50)),f9(c47,c43)),
p33_50 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),X3)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),f13(f16(c48,X2),X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p33_75]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,f20(f22(c52,X1),X2)),X2)
| p33(f11(c46,X1),X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p33_73]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),f13(f16(c48,c49),c50))
| p33(f18(c51,X1),f9(c47,c43)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),X3)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),f13(f16(c48,X2),X3)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,f20(f22(c52,X1),X2)),X2)
| p33(f11(c46,X1),X2) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,X1),c50)
| p33(f18(c51,X1),f9(c47,c43)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p33(f11(c46,c50),f9(c47,c43)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p33_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p33(f18(c51,f20(f22(c52,X1),f9(c47,c43))),c50)
| p33(f11(c46,X1),f9(c47,c43)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p33(f18(c51,f20(f22(c52,X1),X2)),X1)
| p33(f11(c46,X1),X2) ),
p33_72 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p33(f11(c46,c50),f9(c47,c43)),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SYN710-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/10.67 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.19/10.67 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/10.67 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/10.67 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/10.67 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/10.67 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/10.67 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/10.67 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:17:49 UTC 2026
% 0.19/10.68 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/10.68 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/10.75 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/10.75 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/10.80 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/10.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/10.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2299087 completed with status 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.24/10.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/10.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/10.80 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/10.80 % Search class: FGUNM-FFMS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/10.80 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2299092 completed with status 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.24/10.80 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/10.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/10.80 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/10.80 % Search class: FGUNM-FFMS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/10.80 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/10.80 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/10.80 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/10.80
% 0.24/10.80 % Proof found!
% 0.24/10.80 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/10.80 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/10.80 % Parsed axioms : 87
% 0.24/10.80 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Initial clauses : 87
% 0.24/10.80 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Initial clauses in saturation : 87
% 0.24/10.80 % Processed clauses : 224
% 0.24/10.80 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.24/10.80 % ...remaining for further processing : 221
% 0.24/10.80 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.24/10.80 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.24/10.80 % Generated clauses : 156
% 0.24/10.80 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 116
% 0.24/10.80 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Paramodulations : 156
% 0.24/10.80 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Total rewrite steps : 25
% 0.24/10.80 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/10.80 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/10.80 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/10.80 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/10.80 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/10.80 % Current number of processed clauses : 134
% 0.24/10.80 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.24/10.80 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/10.80 % Non-unit-clauses : 105
% 0.24/10.80 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 63
% 0.24/10.80 % ...number of literals in the above : 236
% 0.24/10.80 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Current number of archived clauses : 87
% 0.24/10.80 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3795
% 0.24/10.80 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3118
% 0.24/10.80 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.24/10.80 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 0.24/10.80 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.24/10.80 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.24/10.80 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/10.80 % Termbank termtop insertions : 6077
% 0.24/10.80 % Search garbage collected termcells : 273
% 0.24/10.80
% 0.24/10.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/10.80 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/10.80 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.24/10.80 % Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/10.80 % Maximum resident set size: 3716 pages
% 0.24/10.80
% 0.24/10.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/10.80 % User time : 0.067 s
% 0.24/10.80 % System time : 0.026 s
% 0.24/10.80 % Total time : 0.093 s
% 0.24/10.80 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/10.80 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------