%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : SYN711-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:30:33 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 4.41s % Output : Refutation 4.41s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10199/SYN/SYN711-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ......................................................................................... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 46531] [nf = 0] [nu = 46350] [ut = 30857] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: p17_2(x0,x0) % B27: ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) % B31: p41_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) % B44: ~p41_2(x0,x1) | p42_2(x0,x1) % B75: ~p42_2(x2,x1) | ~p42_2(x0,x2) | p42_2(x0,x1) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U23: < d0 v0 dv0 f3 c2 t5 td3 b nc > p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) % U64: < d1 v0 dv0 f16 c3 t19 td11 > p42_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) % U30857: < d2 v0 dv0 f3 c2 t5 td3 > ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U23: % p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... U23 % Derivation of unit clause U64: % p41_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... B31 % ~p41_2(x0,x1) | p42_2(x0,x1) ....... B44 % p42_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())), f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))), f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... R1 [B31:L0, B44:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U30857: % ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... B27 % ~p42_2(x2,x1) | ~p42_2(x0,x2) | p42_2(x0,x1) ....... B75 % ~p42_2(x0, f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))), f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) | ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()), x0) ....... R1 [B27:L0, B75:L2] % p42_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... U64 % ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()), f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U64:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... U30857 % p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... U23 % [] ....... R1 [U30857:L0, U23:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 878981 % resolvents: 878981 factors: 0 % Number of unit clauses generated: 878350 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.93 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 42 [1] = 30815 [2] = 1 % Total = 30858 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 878350 [2] = 600 [3] = 31 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] p39_1 (+)3 (-)0 % [1] p45_1 (+)0 (-)3 % [2] p17_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [3] p19_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [4] p22_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [5] p24_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [6] p26_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [7] p28_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [8] p2_2 (+)1 (-)0 % [9] p33_2 (+)2 (-)0 % [10] p3_2 (+)2 (-)0 % [11] p40_2 (+)2 (-)0 % [12] p41_2 (+)2 (-)1 % [13] p42_2 (+)6 (-)2 % [14] p43_2 (+)2 (-)0 % [15] p44_2 (+)4 (-)0 % [16] p5_2 (+)7 (-)0 % [17] p6_2 (+)30811 (-)0 % [18] p9_2 (+)4 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)30852 (-)6 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 30858 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2137 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 878984 % Number of unification failures: 123320 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 8 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1039 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3346 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 4 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 847512 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 1 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 41 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 19 % Number of states in UCFA table: 527996 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 914231 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 1.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.58 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 96 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 1002304 % ConstructUnitClause() = 878328 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 2.09 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: 219745 % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 5 secs % CPU time: 4.40 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------