%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN711-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:35:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 5.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 4 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p42_26,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p41(X1,X2)
| p42(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p42_26) ).
cnf(p42_47,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p42(X3,X2)
| ~ p42(X1,X3)
| p42(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p42_47) ).
cnf(p41_80,negated_conjecture,
p41(f16(f7(c46)),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p41_80) ).
cnf(not_p42_78,negated_conjecture,
~ p42(f16(c62),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p42_78) ).
cnf(p42_25,negated_conjecture,
p42(f16(c62),f16(f7(c46))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p42_25) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p41(X1,X2)
| p42(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p42_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p42(X3,X2)
| ~ p42(X1,X3)
| p42(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p42_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p41(X1,X2)
| p42(X1,X2) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
p41(f16(f7(c46)),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))),
p41_80 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p42(f16(c62),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p42_78]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p42(X3,X2)
| ~ p42(X1,X3)
| p42(X1,X2) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p42(f16(f7(c46)),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p42(f16(c62),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p42(X1,f16(f7(c46)))
| p42(X1,f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49))))))))))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
p42(f16(c62),f16(f7(c46))),
p42_25 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN711-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.38 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:13:04 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.57 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.57 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 753989 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/5.57 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.57 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.57 % Search class: FHUNM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.57 % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMM21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.57 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 753996 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.15/5.57 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.57 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.57 % Search class: FHUNM-FFMM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.57 % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMM21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.57 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.57 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/5.57 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/5.57
% 0.15/5.57 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/5.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.57 % Parsed axioms : 89
% 0.15/5.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Initial clauses : 89
% 0.15/5.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 89
% 0.15/5.57 % Processed clauses : 1095
% 0.15/5.57 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % ...subsumed : 337
% 0.15/5.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 758
% 0.15/5.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Generated clauses : 2830
% 0.15/5.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2682
% 0.15/5.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/5.57 % Paramodulations : 2830
% 0.15/5.57 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Total rewrite steps : 87
% 0.15/5.57 % ...of those cached : 51
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.57 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.57 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.57 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.57 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.57 % Current number of processed clauses : 669
% 0.15/5.57 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 51
% 0.15/5.57 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.15/5.57 % Non-unit-clauses : 611
% 0.15/5.57 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1754
% 0.15/5.57 % ...number of literals in the above : 5639
% 0.15/5.57 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Current number of archived clauses : 89
% 0.15/5.57 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 88083
% 0.15/5.57 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57474
% 0.15/5.57 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 317
% 0.15/5.57 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.15/5.57 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.57 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52999
% 0.15/5.57 % Search garbage collected termcells : 194
% 0.15/5.57
% 0.15/5.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.57 % User time : 0.108 s
% 0.15/5.57 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/5.57 % Total time : 0.123 s
% 0.15/5.57 % Maximum resident set size: 3848 pages
% 0.15/5.57
% 0.15/5.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.57 % User time : 0.548 s
% 0.15/5.57 % System time : 0.068 s
% 0.15/5.57 % Total time : 0.616 s
% 0.15/5.57 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.15/5.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------