↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN712-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:35:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (  14 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   65 (   0 equ;  36 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   34 (  34 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p62_69,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p32(X4,X2)
    | ~ p62(X3,X4)
    | ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_69) ).

cnf(p32_20,negated_conjecture,
    p32(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p32_20) ).

cnf(p4_82,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p3(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_82) ).

cnf(p62_100,negated_conjecture,
    p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c71),c72)),c69),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_100) ).

cnf(p62_97,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X3),X4)),X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_97) ).

cnf(p3_104,negated_conjecture,
    p3(f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5),f8(f11(f13(c65,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_104) ).

cnf(not_p62_67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c69),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p62_67) ).

cnf(p62_98,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(X1,X4)
    | p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_98) ).

cnf(p62_99,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_99) ).

cnf(p2_28,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_28) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p32(X4,X2)
    | ~ p62(X3,X4)
    | ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_69]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p32(X4,X2)
    | ~ p62(X3,X4)
    | ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    p32(X1,X1),
    p32_20 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p3(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_82]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X3,X1)
    | ~ p62(X3,X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p3(X2,X4)
    | ~ p2(X1,X3)
    | p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p3(X5,X2)
    | ~ p2(X4,X1)
    | ~ p62(f5(X4,X5),X3)
    | p62(f5(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c71),c72)),c69),
    p62_100 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X3),X4)),X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_97]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p3(f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c71),c72),X2)
    | ~ p2(c64,X1)
    | p62(f5(X1,X2),c69) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    p3(f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5),f8(f11(f13(c65,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5))),
    p3_104 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c69),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p62_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(X1,X4)
    | p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_98]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_99]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X3),X4)),X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(c64,X1)
    | p62(f5(X1,f8(f11(f13(c65,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72))),c69) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X1,X1),
    p2_28 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c69),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(X1,X4)
    | p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2)
    | p62(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72),c69),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p62(c66,c69),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN712-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:18:29 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2985786 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.09/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.44  % Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2985793 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.09/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.44  % Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.44  
% 0.09/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 104
% 0.09/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 104
% 0.09/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 104
% 0.09/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 279
% 0.09/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.09/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 278
% 0.09/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 205
% 0.09/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 168
% 0.09/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 205
% 0.09/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 34
% 0.09/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 174
% 0.09/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 36
% 0.09/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.09/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 136
% 0.09/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
% 0.09/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 350
% 0.09/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 104
% 0.09/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8176
% 0.09/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7266
% 0.09/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.09/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.09/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7578
% 0.09/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 354
% 0.09/0.44  
% 0.09/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.44  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.44  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.09/0.44  % Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.09/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.09/0.44  
% 0.09/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.44  % User time                : 0.054 s
% 0.09/0.44  % System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.09/0.44  % Total time               : 0.076 s
% 0.09/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------