↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN713-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:35:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  22 unt;   3 nHn;  34 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   82 (   0 equ;  41 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   28 (  28 usr;  15 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p10_81,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p13(X2,X4)
    | ~ p12(X1,X3)
    | p10(f14(X1,X2),f14(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_81) ).

cnf(p13_105,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f38(c72,X2),f35(c73,X1))
    | p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,X2)),f19(f22(c70,c69),X1))
    | p13(X1,f23(c74,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p13_105) ).

cnf(not_p58_80,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,c77)),f19(f22(c70,c69),c68)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p58_80) ).

cnf(p56_76,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X4,X1)
    | ~ p56(X4,X3)
    | ~ p40(X3,X2)
    | p56(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p56_76) ).

cnf(p4_87,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p9(X1,X3)
    | ~ p10(X2,X4)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_87) ).

cnf(p12_34,negated_conjecture,
    p12(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p12_34) ).

cnf(p59_35,negated_conjecture,
    p59(f38(c72,c77),f35(c73,c68)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p59_35) ).

cnf(p56_38,negated_conjecture,
    p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),c68)),c64),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p56_38) ).

cnf(p9_2,negated_conjecture,
    p9(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_2) ).

cnf(p40_14,negated_conjecture,
    p40(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p40_14) ).

cnf(p57_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,X2),f23(c74,X3))),X1)
    | p57(f26(f41(c78,X1),X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p57_101) ).

cnf(p57_74,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p57(f26(X1,X2),X3)
    | p57(f26(f28(c71,X1),X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p57_74) ).

cnf(not_p57_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p57(f26(f28(c71,f41(c78,c64)),c67),c77),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p57_39) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p13(X2,X4)
    | ~ p12(X1,X3)
    | p10(f14(X1,X2),f14(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p10_81]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f38(c72,X2),f35(c73,X1))
    | p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,X2)),f19(f22(c70,c69),X1))
    | p13(X1,f23(c74,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p13_105]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,c77)),f19(f22(c70,c69),c68)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p58_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X4,X1)
    | ~ p56(X4,X3)
    | ~ p40(X3,X2)
    | p56(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p56_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p9(X1,X3)
    | ~ p10(X2,X4)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p13(X2,X4)
    | ~ p12(X1,X3)
    | p10(f14(X1,X2),f14(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    p12(X1,X1),
    p12_34 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f38(c72,X2),f35(c73,X1))
    | p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,X2)),f19(f22(c70,c69),X1))
    | p13(X1,f23(c74,X2)) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    p59(f38(c72,c77),f35(c73,c68)),
    p59_35 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,c77)),f19(f22(c70,c69),c68)),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(X4,X1)
    | ~ p56(X4,X3)
    | ~ p40(X3,X2)
    | p56(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),c68)),c64),
    p56_38 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p9(X1,X3)
    | ~ p10(X2,X4)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    p9(X1,X1),
    p9_2 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p13(X2,X3)
    | p10(f14(X1,X2),f14(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    p13(c68,f23(c74,c77)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p40(c64,X2)
    | ~ p4(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),c68)),X1)
    | p56(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    p40(X1,X1),
    p40_14 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p10(X2,X3)
    | p4(f11(X1,X2),f11(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    p10(f14(X1,c68),f14(X1,f23(c74,c77))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,X2),f23(c74,X3))),X1)
    | p57(f26(f41(c78,X1),X2),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p57_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p4(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),c68)),X1)
    | p56(X1,c64) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    p4(f11(X1,f14(X2,c68)),f11(X1,f14(X2,f23(c74,c77)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p57(f26(X1,X2),X3)
    | p57(f26(f28(c71,X1),X2),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p57_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,X2),f23(c74,X3))),X1)
    | p57(f26(f41(c78,X1),X2),X3) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),f23(c74,c77))),c64),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p57(f26(f28(c71,f41(c78,c64)),c67),c77),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p57_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p57(f26(X1,X2),X3)
    | p57(f26(f28(c71,X1),X2),X3) ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    p57(f26(f41(c78,c64),c67),c77),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p57(f26(f28(c71,f41(c78,c64)),c67),c77),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN713-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.50  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.50  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.50  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.50  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.50  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.50  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.50  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.50  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:15:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.51  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.51  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.59  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1335994 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.17/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/0.59  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.59  % Search class: FGUNM-FFMS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.59  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % new_bool_3 with pid 1336002 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/0.59  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.59  % Search class: FGUNM-FFMS22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.59  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.59  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.59  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.59  
% 0.17/0.59  % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.59  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.59  % Parsed axioms                        : 105
% 0.17/0.59  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Initial clauses                      : 105
% 0.17/0.59  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 105
% 0.17/0.59  % Processed clauses                    : 320
% 0.17/0.59  % ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 0.17/0.59  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % ...remaining for further processing  : 313
% 0.17/0.59  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Generated clauses                    : 237
% 0.17/0.59  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 128
% 0.17/0.59  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Paramodulations                      : 237
% 0.17/0.59  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Total rewrite steps                  : 114
% 0.17/0.59  % ...of those cached                   : 19
% 0.17/0.59  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.59  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.59  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.59  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.59  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.59  % Current number of processed clauses  : 208
% 0.17/0.59  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 63
% 0.17/0.59  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.59  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.17/0.59  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 143
% 0.17/0.59  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.17/0.59  % ...number of literals in the above   : 26
% 0.17/0.59  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Current number of archived clauses   : 105
% 0.17/0.59  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5121
% 0.17/0.59  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4819
% 0.17/0.59  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.17/0.59  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.59  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7552
% 0.17/0.59  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 365
% 0.17/0.59  
% 0.17/0.59  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.59  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.59  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.59  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.17/0.59  % Maximum resident set size: 3700 pages
% 0.17/0.59  
% 0.17/0.59  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.59  % User time                : 0.099 s
% 0.17/0.59  % System time              : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.59  % Total time               : 0.119 s
% 0.17/0.59  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.17/0.59  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------