%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN716-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:57 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 0 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 34 ( 34 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 79 ( 18 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p62_68,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p32(X4,X2)
| ~ p62(X3,X4)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_68) ).
cnf(p32_20,negated_conjecture,
p32(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p32_20) ).
cnf(p4_86,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p3(X2,X4)
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_86) ).
cnf(p62_100,negated_conjecture,
p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,c67),c68),c69)),c70),c71)),c72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_100) ).
cnf(p62_97,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c66,X1),X3),X4)),X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_97) ).
cnf(p3_106,negated_conjecture,
p3(f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5),f16(f19(f21(c66,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_106) ).
cnf(p62_99,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_99) ).
cnf(p2_28,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_28) ).
cnf(not_p62_34,negated_conjecture,
~ p62(c67,c72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p62_34) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p32(X4,X2)
| ~ p62(X3,X4)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_68]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p32(X4,X2)
| ~ p62(X3,X4)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p32(X1,X1),
p32_20 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p3(X2,X4)
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p62(X3,X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p3(X2,X4)
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4)) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p3(X5,X2)
| ~ p2(X4,X1)
| ~ p62(f5(X4,X5),X3)
| p62(f5(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,c67),c68),c69)),c70),c71)),c72),
p62_100 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c66,X1),X3),X4)),X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_97]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p3(f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,c67),c68),c69)),c70),c71),X2)
| ~ p2(c64,X1)
| p62(f5(X1,X2),c72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p3(f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5),f16(f19(f21(c66,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5))),
p3_106 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p62_99]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c66,X1),X3),X4)),X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(c64,X1)
| p62(f5(X1,f16(f19(f21(c66,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71))),c72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_28 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ p62(c67,c72),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p62_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2)
| p62(X1,X2) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71),c72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ p62(c67,c72),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SYN716-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.57 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:14:46 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.66 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1740422 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.66 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.66 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1740428 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.66 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.66 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.66 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.66 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.66
% 0.15/0.66 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.66 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.66 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.66 % Parsed axioms : 106
% 0.15/0.66 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Initial clauses : 106
% 0.15/0.66 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Initial clauses in saturation : 106
% 0.15/0.66 % Processed clauses : 289
% 0.15/0.66 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.66 % ...remaining for further processing : 287
% 0.15/0.66 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Generated clauses : 230
% 0.15/0.66 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 192
% 0.15/0.66 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Paramodulations : 230
% 0.15/0.66 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Total rewrite steps : 35
% 0.15/0.66 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of processed clauses : 182
% 0.15/0.66 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.15/0.66 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.66 % Non-unit-clauses : 144
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 113
% 0.15/0.66 % ...number of literals in the above : 419
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Current number of archived clauses : 105
% 0.15/0.66 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6187
% 0.15/0.66 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5513
% 0.15/0.66 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.66 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.66 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.66 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8292
% 0.15/0.66 % Search garbage collected termcells : 357
% 0.15/0.66
% 0.15/0.66 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.66 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.66 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Maximum resident set size: 3500 pages
% 0.15/0.66
% 0.15/0.66 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.66 % User time : 0.058 s
% 0.15/0.66 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Total time : 0.074 s
% 0.15/0.66 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.66 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------