↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN717-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:35:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 5.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (   0 equ;  34 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p60_84,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p20(X4,X2)
    | ~ p60(X3,X4)
    | ~ p24(X3,X1)
    | p60(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p60_84) ).

cnf(not_p60_107,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X4)),c72)
    | ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X3),X2)),c72)
    | ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p60_107) ).

cnf(p20_29,negated_conjecture,
    p20(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p20_29) ).

cnf(p24_94,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p23(X2,X4)
    | ~ p22(X1,X3)
    | p24(f25(X1,X2),f25(X3,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p24_94) ).

cnf(p59_44,negated_conjecture,
    p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,c77),c78)),c72),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p59_44) ).

cnf(p60_42,negated_conjecture,
    p60(f25(c75,c79),f21(c76,c78)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p60_42) ).

cnf(p22_28,negated_conjecture,
    p22(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p22_28) ).

cnf(p23_36,negated_conjecture,
    p23(c79,c77),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p23_36) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p20(X4,X2)
    | ~ p60(X3,X4)
    | ~ p24(X3,X1)
    | p60(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p60_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X4)),c72)
    | ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X3),X2)),c72)
    | ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p60_107]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p20(X4,X2)
    | ~ p60(X3,X4)
    | ~ p24(X3,X1)
    | p60(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    p20(X1,X1),
    p20_29 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p23(X2,X4)
    | ~ p22(X1,X3)
    | p24(f25(X1,X2),f25(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p24_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X4)),c72)
    | ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X3),X2)),c72)
    | ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,X2)) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,c77),c78)),c72),
    p59_44 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p24(X3,X1)
    | ~ p60(X3,X2)
    | p60(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p23(X2,X4)
    | ~ p22(X1,X3)
    | p24(f25(X1,X2),f25(X3,X4)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X2)),c72)
    | ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,c78)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p23(X5,X2)
    | ~ p22(X4,X1)
    | ~ p60(f25(X4,X5),X3)
    | p60(f25(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    p60(f25(c75,c79),f21(c76,c78)),
    p60_42 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p60(f25(c75,c77),f21(c76,c78)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p23(c79,X2)
    | ~ p22(c75,X1)
    | p60(f25(X1,X2),f21(c76,c78)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    p22(X1,X1),
    p22_28 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    p23(c79,c77),
    p23_36 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN717-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:13:12 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 2999250 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/5.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.46  % Search class: FGHNM-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.46  % partial match(1): FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.46  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2999257 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.46  % Search class: FGHNM-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.46  % partial match(1): FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.46  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.15/5.46  
% 0.15/5.46  % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/5.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.15/5.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Initial clauses                      : 113
% 0.15/5.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 113
% 0.15/5.46  % Processed clauses                    : 320
% 0.15/5.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % ...subsumed                          : 79
% 0.15/5.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 241
% 0.15/5.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Generated clauses                    : 421
% 0.15/5.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 344
% 0.15/5.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Paramodulations                      : 421
% 0.15/5.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 91
% 0.15/5.46  % ...of those cached                   : 44
% 0.15/5.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/5.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/5.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/5.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/5.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/5.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 241
% 0.15/5.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 48
% 0.15/5.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.15/5.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 190
% 0.15/5.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137
% 0.15/5.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 595
% 0.15/5.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19088
% 0.15/5.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16479
% 0.15/5.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 79
% 0.15/5.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 91
% 0.15/5.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.15/5.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/5.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 9479
% 0.15/5.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 365
% 0.15/5.46  
% 0.15/5.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.46  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.15/5.46  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.46  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.15/5.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4016 pages
% 0.15/5.46  
% 0.15/5.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.46  % User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.15/5.46  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.15/5.46  % Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.15/5.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/5.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------