↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN719-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:25:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   57 (   0 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   30 (  30 usr;  15 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p68_126,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p69(f36(c86,f38(X4,f40(f42(f44(f46(c87,X1),X2),X4),X3))),f30(c88,f32(c89,f8(c75,c76))))
    | ~ p14(X2,f23(f26(c84,X4),X3))
    | ~ p66(f12(c78,c77),X1)
    | ~ p67(f16(c80,X3),c82)
    | p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p68_126) ).

cnf(p69_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p70(X2,X1)
    | p69(f36(c86,X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p69_52) ).

cnf(p66_41,negated_conjecture,
    p66(f12(c78,c77),c79),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p66_41) ).

cnf(p70_43,negated_conjecture,
    p70(f30(c88,X1),f38(c85,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p70_43) ).

cnf(p14_90,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X3,X2)
    | ~ p14(X3,X1)
    | p14(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_90) ).

cnf(p14_38,negated_conjecture,
    p14(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_38) ).

cnf(p67_42,negated_conjecture,
    p67(f16(c80,c81),c82),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p67_42) ).

cnf(p14_45,negated_conjecture,
    p14(f23(f26(c84,c85),X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p14_45) ).

cnf(not_p68_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),c79),c81),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p68_46) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p69(f36(c86,f38(X4,f40(f42(f44(f46(c87,X1),X2),X4),X3))),f30(c88,f32(c89,f8(c75,c76))))
    | ~ p14(X2,f23(f26(c84,X4),X3))
    | ~ p66(f12(c78,c77),X1)
    | ~ p67(f16(c80,X3),c82)
    | p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),X1),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p68_126]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p70(X2,X1)
    | p69(f36(c86,X1),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p69_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p69(f36(c86,f38(X4,f40(f42(f44(f46(c87,X1),X2),X4),X3))),f30(c88,f32(c89,f8(c75,c76))))
    | ~ p14(X2,f23(f26(c84,X4),X3))
    | ~ p66(f12(c78,c77),X1)
    | ~ p67(f16(c80,X3),c82)
    | p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),X1),X2) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    p66(f12(c78,c77),c79),
    p66_41 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p70(X2,X1)
    | p69(f36(c86,X1),X2) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p70(f30(c88,X1),f38(c85,X2)),
    p70_43 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X3,X2)
    | ~ p14(X3,X1)
    | p14(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p14_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X1,f23(f26(c84,X2),X3))
    | ~ p67(f16(c80,X3),c82)
    | ~ p69(f36(c86,f38(X2,f40(f42(f44(f46(c87,c79),X1),X2),X3))),f30(c88,f32(c89,f8(c75,c76))))
    | p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),c79),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    p69(f36(c86,f38(c85,X1)),f30(c88,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X3,X2)
    | ~ p14(X3,X1)
    | p14(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    p14(X1,X1),
    p14_38 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X1,f23(f26(c84,c85),X2))
    | ~ p67(f16(c80,X2),c82)
    | p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),c79),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    p67(f16(c80,c81),c82),
    p67_42 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X2,X1)
    | p14(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    p14(f23(f26(c84,c85),X1),X1),
    p14_45 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),c79),c81),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p68_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p14(X1,f23(f26(c84,c85),c81))
    | p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),c79),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    p14(X1,f23(f26(c84,c85),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p68(f19(f21(c83,c77),c79),c81),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SYN719-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:13:14 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1606856 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.46  % Search class: FHUNM-FFMS22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46  % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 1606863 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.46  % Search class: FHUNM-FFMS22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46  % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 126
% 0.14/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 126
% 0.14/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 126
% 0.14/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 387
% 0.14/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.14/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.14/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 380
% 0.14/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 342
% 0.14/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 200
% 0.14/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 342
% 0.14/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 143
% 0.14/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 44
% 0.14/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 254
% 0.14/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 70
% 0.14/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 183
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.14/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 82
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 126
% 0.14/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 8979
% 0.14/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7853
% 0.14/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.14/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.14/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 29
% 0.14/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 10521
% 0.14/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 457
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.46  % User time                : 0.024 s
% 0.14/0.46  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Total time               : 0.031 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3776 pages
% 0.14/0.46  
% 0.14/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.46  % User time                : 0.126 s
% 0.14/0.46  % System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Total time               : 0.141 s
% 0.14/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------