%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 04:56:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.83s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.83s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X1)
| ~ r(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
r(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,a)
| ~ r(b,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
( r(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ro951xl/input.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X1)
| ~ r(X1,X2) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
r(a,b),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,a)
| ~ r(b,X1) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
q(a,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( r(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X3,X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ r(b,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
r(X1,a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:55:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.83/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.83/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.83/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.83/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C18_F1_PI_AE_R8_CS_SP_S2S
% 7.83/2.44 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.83/2.44 #
% 7.83/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.83/2.44
% 7.83/2.44 # Proof found!
% 7.83/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.83/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.83/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.83/2.44
% 7.83/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.83/2.44 # User time : 0.025 s
% 7.83/2.44 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.83/2.44 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.83/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.83/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------