↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN722+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:41:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 1.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  107 (  51   ~;  43   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  17   !;   4   ?;   5   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ~ p(b)
        | ~ p(a) )
      & ! [X1] :
        ? [X2] :
          ( ~ q(d)
          | ~ q(c)
          | ~ q(X2)
          | ~ q(X1)
          | p(X1) )
      & ! [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & ( r(X0)
            | p(X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm119) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ( ~ p(b)
          | ~ p(a) )
        & ! [X1] :
          ? [X2] :
            ( ~ q(d)
            | ~ q(c)
            | ~ q(X2)
            | ~ q(X1)
            | p(X1) )
        & ! [X0] :
            ( q(X0)
            & ( r(X0)
              | p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( ( ~ p(b)
      | ~ p(a) )
    & ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ~ q(d)
        | ~ q(c)
        | ~ q(X2)
        | ~ q(X1)
        | p(X1) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & ( r(X0)
          | p(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ( ~ p(b)
      | ~ p(a) )
    & ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ~ q(d)
        | ~ q(c)
        | ~ q(X2)
        | ~ q(X1)
        | p(X1) )
    & ! [X0] : q(X0) ),
    inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ( ~ p(b)
      | ~ p(a) )
    & ! [X1] :
        ( ~ q(d)
        | ~ q(c)
        | ~ q(sK0(X1))
        | ~ q(X1)
        | p(X1) )
    & ! [X0] : q(X0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X1))],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ~ p(b)
    | ~ p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ q(d)
      | ~ q(c)
      | ~ q(sK0(X1))
      | ~ q(X1)
      | p(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0] : q(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : q(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p(X0)
      | ~ q(d)
      | ~ q(c)
      | ~ q(X0)
      | ~ q(sK0(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(b)
    | ~ p(a) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p(X0)
      | ~ q(d)
      | ~ q(c)
      | ~ q(sK0(X0)) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( p(X0)
      | ~ q(d)
      | ~ q(c) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : p(X0),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_49,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ~ p(b),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_68]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN722+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:11:18 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.44  % Proving...
% 0.47/1.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.47/1.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.47/1.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.47/1.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.47/1.30  
% 0.47/1.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------