%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SYN724-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:26:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.27s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 4 unt; 2 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(thm31_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk1)
| r(sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm31_10) ).
cnf(thm31_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1)
| s(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm31_3) ).
cnf(thm31_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ r(sk2)
| r(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm31_9) ).
cnf(thm31_4,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk2)
| r(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm31_4) ).
cnf(thm31_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1)
| ~ r(sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm31_15) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk1)
| r(sk2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm31_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1)
| s(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm31_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ r(sk2)
| r(sk1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm31_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk1)
| r(sk2) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1)
| s(X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk2)
| r(sk1) ),
thm31_4 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1)
| ~ r(sk2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm31_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ r(sk2)
| r(sk1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
r(sk2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1)
| ~ r(sk2) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| r(sk1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
r(sk1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_9]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ s(sk2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_9]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SYN724-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 11:13:20 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % new_bool_3 with pid 3928478 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.53 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.53 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3928483 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.53 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.53 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.27/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.27/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.27/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.27/0.53 % Processed clauses : 8
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.27/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.27/0.53 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.27/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.27/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.27/0.53 % ...of those cached : 6
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.27/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 163
% 0.27/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 13
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.53 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/0.53 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.27/0.53
% 0.27/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.53 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/0.53 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.27/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------