%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:06:25 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.56s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.02/0.09 % Problem : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.02/0.09 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 21:25:09 EDT 2024 % 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.14/0.52 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.14/0.56 %------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.56 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.14/0.56 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.14/0.56 % Transform :cnf % 0.14/0.56 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.14/0.56 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.14/0.56 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.14/0.56 %------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.56 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.56 % File : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.14/0.56 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.14/0.56 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem THM400 % 0.14/0.56 % Version : Especial. % 0.14/0.56 % English : % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 % Refs : [And97] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.14/0.56 % Source : [And97] % 0.14/0.56 % Names : THM400 [And97] % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.14/0.56 % Rating : 0.00 v2.5.0 % 0.14/0.56 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 2 unt; 1 nHn; 5 RR) % 0.14/0.56 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 7 neg) % 0.14/0.56 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg) % 0.14/0.56 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.14/0.56 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty) % 0.14/0.56 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.14/0.56 % Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn) % 0.14/0.56 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 % Comments : % 0.14/0.56 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.56 cnf(thm400_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.14/0.56 ( p(A,C) % 0.14/0.56 | ~ p(A,B) % 0.14/0.56 | ~ p(B,C) ) ). % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 cnf(thm400_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.14/0.56 ( q(A,C) % 0.14/0.56 | ~ q(A,B) % 0.14/0.56 | ~ q(B,C) ) ). % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 cnf(thm400_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.14/0.56 ( q(B,A) % 0.14/0.56 | ~ q(A,B) ) ). % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 cnf(thm400_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.14/0.56 ( p(A,B) % 0.14/0.56 | q(A,B) ) ). % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 cnf(thm400_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.14/0.56 ~ p(sk1,sk2) ). % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 cnf(thm400_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.14/0.56 ~ q(sk3,sk4) ). % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.56 %------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.56 % Proof found % 0.14/0.56 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.14/0.56 % SZS output start Proof % 0.14/0.56 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.14/0.56 %VarNum:20(SingletonVarNum:10) % 0.14/0.56 %MaxLitNum:3 % 0.14/0.56 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.14/0.56 %SharedTerms:6 % 0.14/0.56 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 0.14/0.56 %singleGoalClaCount:2 % 0.14/0.56 [1]~P1(a1,a2) % 0.14/0.56 [2]~P2(a3,a4) % 0.14/0.56 [3]P2(x31,x32)+P1(x31,x32) % 0.14/0.56 [4]~P2(x42,x41)+P2(x41,x42) % 0.14/0.56 [5]~P1(x51,x53)+P1(x51,x52)+~P1(x53,x52) % 0.14/0.56 [6]~P2(x61,x63)+P2(x61,x62)+~P2(x63,x62) % 0.14/0.56 %EqnAxiom % 0.14/0.56 % 0.14/0.56 %------------------------------------------- % 0.14/0.57 cnf(9,plain, % 0.14/0.57 (~P2(a4,a3)), % 0.14/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4])). % 0.14/0.57 cnf(11,plain, % 0.14/0.57 (~P2(x111,a1)+P2(x111,a2)), % 0.14/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,4,6])). % 0.14/0.57 cnf(13,plain, % 0.14/0.57 (P2(a2,x131)+~P2(x131,a1)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,4])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(15,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (~P1(a1,x151)+P2(x151,a2)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,3])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(16,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(a2,x161)+~P1(a1,x161)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,4])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(17,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(a1,x171)+P2(a2,x171)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,3])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(18,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(x181,a2)+P2(a1,x181)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,4])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(19,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(x191,a1)+P2(x191,a2)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,4])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(20,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(x201,a2)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,11])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(23,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(a2,a1)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(26,plain, % 0.49/0.57 (P2(a2,x261)), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[23,20,6,13])). % 0.49/0.57 cnf(29,plain, % 0.49/0.57 ($false), % 0.49/0.57 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,26,9,6]), % 0.49/0.57 ['proof']). % 0.49/0.57 % SZS output end Proof % 0.49/0.57 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------