%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN728-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:06:26 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.59s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN728-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 23:00:39 EDT 2024 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.18/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.18/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.59 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.18/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.18/0.59 % Transform :cnf % 0.18/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.18/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.18/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.18/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.59 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.59 % File : SYN728-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.18/0.59 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.18/0.59 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem THM69 % 0.18/0.59 % Version : Especial. % 0.18/0.59 % English : % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 % Refs : [And97] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 0.18/0.59 % Source : [And97] % 0.18/0.59 % Names : THM69 [And97] % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.18/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0 % 0.18/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 0 unt; 2 nHn; 2 RR) % 0.18/0.59 % Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 5 neg) % 0.18/0.59 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 2 avg) % 0.18/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 0.18/0.59 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 0.18/0.59 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.18/0.59 % Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn) % 0.18/0.59 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 % Comments : % 0.18/0.59 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.59 cnf(thm69_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.18/0.59 ( p(C,C) % 0.18/0.59 | ~ p(A,B) ) ). % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 cnf(thm69_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.18/0.59 ( m(A) % 0.18/0.59 | p(A,sk1(A)) ) ). % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 cnf(thm69_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.18/0.59 ( q(f(A,sk1(A))) % 0.18/0.59 | p(A,sk1(A)) ) ). % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 cnf(thm69_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.18/0.59 ( ~ m(g(A)) % 0.18/0.59 | ~ q(A) ) ). % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 cnf(thm69_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.18/0.59 ( ~ p(sk2,sk2) % 0.18/0.59 | ~ p(g(sk2),A) ) ). % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.59 % Proof found % 0.18/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.18/0.59 % SZS output start Proof % 0.18/0.59 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.18/0.59 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:7) % 0.18/0.59 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.18/0.59 %MaxfuncDepth:2 % 0.18/0.59 %SharedTerms:3 % 0.18/0.59 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 % 0.18/0.59 [1]~P1(x11)+~P2(f1(x11)) % 0.18/0.59 [2]P2(x21)+P3(x21,f3(x21)) % 0.18/0.59 [4]~P3(f1(a4),x41)+~P3(a4,a4) % 0.18/0.59 [5]P3(x51,f3(x51))+P1(f2(x51,f3(x51))) % 0.18/0.59 [3]P3(x31,x31)+~P3(x32,x33) % 0.18/0.59 %EqnAxiom % 0.18/0.59 % 0.18/0.59 %------------------------------------------- % 0.18/0.60 cnf(7,plain, % 0.18/0.60 (~P1(x71)+P3(f1(x71),f3(f1(x71)))), % 0.18/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1])). % 0.18/0.60 cnf(8,plain, % 0.18/0.60 (~P3(x81,x82)+~P3(a4,a4)), % 0.18/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4])). % 0.18/0.60 cnf(9,plain, % 0.18/0.60 (~P3(a4,a4)), % 0.18/0.60 inference(factoring_inference,[],[8])). % 0.18/0.60 cnf(10,plain, % 0.18/0.60 (~P3(x101,x102)), % 0.18/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,3])). % 0.18/0.60 cnf(12,plain, % 0.18/0.60 (~P1(x121)), % 0.18/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[9,3,7])). % 0.18/0.60 cnf(15,plain, % 0.18/0.60 ($false), % 0.18/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,12,5]), % 0.18/0.60 ['proof']). % 0.18/0.60 % SZS output end Proof % 0.18/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------