%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:06:26 EDT 2024 % Result : Theorem 60.84s 61.88s % Output : CNFRefutation 61.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 18:54:38 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.54/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 60.84/61.85 %------------------------------------------- % 60.84/61.85 % File :CSE---1.7 % 60.84/61.85 % Problem :theBenchmark % 60.84/61.85 % Transform :cnf % 60.84/61.85 % Format :tptp:raw % 60.84/61.85 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 60.84/61.85 % 60.84/61.85 % Result :Theorem 60.260000s % 60.84/61.85 % Output :CNFRefutation 60.260000s % 60.84/61.85 %------------------------------------------- % 60.84/61.87 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 60.84/61.87 % File : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0. % 60.84/61.87 % Domain : Syntactic % 60.84/61.87 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem THM72 % 60.84/61.87 % Version : Especial. % 60.84/61.87 % English : % 60.84/61.87 % 60.84/61.87 % Refs : [And97] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 60.84/61.87 % Source : [And97] % 60.84/61.87 % Names : THM72 [And97] % 60.84/61.87 % 60.84/61.87 % Status : Theorem % 60.84/61.87 % Rating : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v2.5.0 % 60.84/61.87 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 60.84/61.87 % Number of atoms : 9 ( 0 equ) % 60.84/61.87 % Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 9 avg) % 60.84/61.87 % Number of connectives : 8 ( 0 ~; 0 |; 4 &) % 60.84/61.87 % ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 60.84/61.87 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 7 avg) % 60.84/61.87 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg) % 60.84/61.87 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty) % 60.84/61.87 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-1 aty) % 60.84/61.87 % Number of variables : 5 ( 3 !; 2 ?) % 60.84/61.87 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 60.84/61.87 % 60.84/61.87 % Comments : % 60.84/61.87 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 60.84/61.87 fof(thm72,conjecture, % 60.84/61.87 ( ( ! [X] : % 60.84/61.87 ? [Y] : % 60.84/61.87 ( p(X) % 60.84/61.87 => ( l(X,g(h(Y))) % 60.84/61.87 & p(Y) ) ) % 60.84/61.87 & ! [W] : % 60.84/61.87 ( p(W) % 60.84/61.87 => ( p(g(W)) % 60.84/61.87 & p(h(W)) ) ) ) % 60.84/61.87 => ! [X] : % 60.84/61.87 ( p(X) % 60.84/61.87 => ? [Y] : % 60.84/61.87 ( l(X,Y) % 60.84/61.87 & p(Y) ) ) ) ). % 60.84/61.87 % 60.84/61.87 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 60.84/61.87 %------------------------------------------- % 60.84/61.87 % Proof found % 60.84/61.88 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 60.84/61.88 % SZS output start Proof % 60.84/61.89 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0) % 60.84/61.89 %VarNum:11(SingletonVarNum:5) % 60.84/61.89 %MaxLitNum:2 % 60.84/61.89 %MaxfuncDepth:3 % 60.84/61.89 %SharedTerms:2 % 60.84/61.89 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 60.84/61.89 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 60.84/61.89 [1]P1(a1) % 60.84/61.89 [5]~P1(x51)+~P2(a1,x51) % 60.84/61.89 [2]~P1(x21)+P1(f3(x21)) % 60.84/61.89 [3]~P1(x31)+P1(f4(x31)) % 60.84/61.89 [4]~P1(x41)+P1(f2(x41)) % 60.84/61.89 [6]~P1(x61)+P2(x61,f4(f3(f2(x61)))) % 60.84/61.89 %EqnAxiom % 60.84/61.89 % 60.84/61.89 %------------------------------------------- % 61.00/62.00 cnf(17,plain, % 61.00/62.00 (P1(f3(f2(a1)))), % 61.00/62.00 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4])). % 61.00/62.00 cnf(154425,plain, % 61.00/62.00 (P1(f4(f3(f2(a1))))), % 61.00/62.00 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,4,3])). % 61.00/62.00 cnf(155075,plain, % 61.00/62.00 (P2(a1,f4(f3(f2(a1))))), % 61.00/62.00 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6])). % 61.00/62.00 cnf(155078,plain, % 61.00/62.00 ($false), % 61.00/62.00 inference(scs_inference,[],[155075,154425,5]), % 61.00/62.00 ['proof']). % 61.14/62.15 % SZS output end Proof % 61.14/62.15 % Total time :60.260000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------