↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SYN729+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:10:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm72,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [W] :
          ( p(W)
         => ( p(h(W))
            & p(g(W)) ) )
      & ! [X] :
        ? [Y] :
          ( p(X)
         => ( p(Y)
            & l(X,g(h(Y))) ) ) )
   => ! [X] :
        ( p(X)
       => ? [Y] :
            ( p(Y)
            & l(X,Y) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thm72) ).

fof(f_1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ! [X] :
          ( p(X)
         => ? [Y] :
              ( p(Y)
              & l(X,Y) ) )
    & ! [W] :
        ( p(W)
       => ( p(h(W))
          & p(g(W)) ) )
    & ! [X] :
      ? [Y] :
        ( p(X)
       => ( p(Y)
          & l(X,g(h(Y))) ) ) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[thm72]) ).

fof(f_1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [X] :
        ( ! [Y] :
            ( ~ p(Y)
            | ~ l(X,Y) )
        & p(X) )
    & ! [W] :
        ( ( p(h(W))
          & p(g(W)) )
        | ~ p(W) )
    & ! [X] :
      ? [Y] :
        ( ( p(Y)
          & l(X,g(h(Y))) )
        | ~ p(X) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] :
            ( ~ p(U_3)
            | ~ l(U_4,U_3) )
        & p(U_4) )
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( ( p(h(U_2))
          & p(g(U_2)) )
        | ~ p(U_2) )
    & ! [U_1] :
      ? [U_0] :
        ( ( p(U_0)
          & l(U_1,g(h(U_0))) )
        | ~ p(U_1) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] :
            ( ~ p(U_3)
            | ~ l(U_4,U_3) )
        & p(U_4) )
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( ( p(h(U_2))
          & p(g(U_2)) )
        | ~ p(U_2) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( ? [U_0] :
            ( p(U_0)
            & l(U_1,g(h(U_0))) )
        | ~ p(U_1) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_1_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ? [U_4] :
        ( ! [U_3] :
            ( ~ p(U_3)
            | ~ l(U_4,U_3) )
        & p(U_4) )
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( ( p(h(U_2))
          & p(g(U_2)) )
        | ~ p(U_2) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( ( p(sK1(U_1))
          & l(U_1,g(h(sK1(U_1)))) )
        | ~ p(U_1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_0,sK1(U_1))],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_1_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_3] :
        ( ~ p(U_3)
        | ~ l(sK2,U_3) )
    & p(sK2)
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( ( p(h(U_2))
          & p(g(U_2)) )
        | ~ p(U_2) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( ( p(sK1(U_1))
          & l(U_1,g(h(sK1(U_1)))) )
        | ~ p(U_1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U_4,sK2)],[f_1_5]) ).

fof(f_1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_2] :
        ( p(h(U_2))
        | ~ sP1(U_2) )
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( p(g(U_2))
        | ~ sP1(U_2) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( p(sK1(U_1))
        | ~ sP0(U_1) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( l(U_1,g(h(sK1(U_1))))
        | ~ sP0(U_1) )
    & ! [U_3] :
        ( ~ p(U_3)
        | ~ l(sK2,U_3) )
    & p(sK2)
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( sP1(U_2)
        | ~ p(U_2) )
    & ! [U_1] :
        ( sP0(U_1)
        | ~ p(U_1) ) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa),new_symbols(definitional,[sP0,sP1])],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(f_1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0(U_1)
    | ~ p(U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP1(U_2)
    | ~ p(U_2) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_10,negated_conjecture,
    p(sK2),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(U_3)
    | ~ l(sK2,U_3) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( l(U_1,g(h(sK1(U_1))))
    | ~ sP0(U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(sK1(U_1))
    | ~ sP0(U_1) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(g(U_2))
    | ~ sP1(U_2) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(f_1_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(h(U_2))
    | ~ sP1(U_2) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(sat_proved,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cadical,[status(thm)],[]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN729+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 07:07:33 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------