↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:48:45 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 0.64s
% Output   : Refutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Wed May  8 19:49:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.47/0.64  % Version:  1.5
% 0.47/0.64  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/0.64  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.47/0.64  fof(thm72,conjecture,(((![X]:(?[Y]:(p(X)=>(l(X,g(h(Y)))&p(Y)))))&(![W]:(p(W)=>(p(g(W))&p(h(W))))))=>(![X]:(p(X)=>(?[Y]:(l(X,Y)&p(Y)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm72)).
% 0.47/0.64  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(((![X]:(?[Y]:(p(X)=>(l(X,g(h(Y)))&p(Y)))))&(![W]:(p(W)=>(p(g(W))&p(h(W))))))=>(![X]:(p(X)=>(?[Y]:(l(X,Y)&p(Y))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm72])).
% 0.47/0.64  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(?[Y]:(~p(X)|(l(X,g(h(Y)))&p(Y)))))&(![W]:(~p(W)|(p(g(W))&p(h(W))))))&(?[X]:(p(X)&(![Y]:(~l(X,Y)|~p(Y)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.47/0.64  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(((![X]:(~p(X)|(?[Y]:(l(X,g(h(Y)))&p(Y)))))&(![W]:(~p(W)|(p(g(W))&p(h(W))))))&(?[X]:(p(X)&(![Y]:(~l(X,Y)|~p(Y)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.47/0.64  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(((![X2]:(~p(X2)|(?[X3]:(l(X2,g(h(X3)))&p(X3)))))&(![X4]:(~p(X4)|(p(g(X4))&p(h(X4))))))&(?[X5]:(p(X5)&(![X6]:(~l(X5,X6)|~p(X6)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.47/0.64  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(![X4]:(![X6]:(((~p(X2)|(l(X2,g(h(skolem0001(X2))))&p(skolem0001(X2))))&(~p(X4)|(p(g(X4))&p(h(X4)))))&(p(skolem0002)&(~l(skolem0002,X6)|~p(X6))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(((![X2]:(~p(X2)|(l(X2,g(h(skolem0001(X2))))&p(skolem0001(X2)))))&(![X4]:(~p(X4)|(p(g(X4))&p(h(X4))))))&(p(skolem0002)&(![X6]:(~l(skolem0002,X6)|~p(X6))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c3])).])).
% 0.47/0.64  fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(![X4]:(![X6]:((((~p(X2)|l(X2,g(h(skolem0001(X2)))))&(~p(X2)|p(skolem0001(X2))))&((~p(X4)|p(g(X4)))&(~p(X4)|p(h(X4)))))&(p(skolem0002)&(~l(skolem0002,X6)|~p(X6))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,~p(X8)|p(g(X8)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,p(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,~p(X7)|p(skolem0001(X7)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c13,plain,p(skolem0001(skolem0002)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c8, c11])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,~p(X10)|p(h(X10)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c22,plain,p(h(skolem0001(skolem0002))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c10, c13])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c48,plain,p(g(h(skolem0001(skolem0002)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c22, c9])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,~l(skolem0002,X11)|~p(X11),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,~p(X9)|l(X9,g(h(skolem0001(X9)))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c21,plain,l(skolem0002,g(h(skolem0001(skolem0002)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c7, c11])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c101,plain,~p(g(h(skolem0001(skolem0002)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c21, c12])).
% 0.47/0.64  cnf(c174,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c101, c48])).
% 0.47/0.64  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.47/0.64  
% 0.47/0.64  % Initial clauses    : 6
% 0.47/0.64  % Processed clauses  : 52
% 0.47/0.64  % Factors computed   : 0
% 0.47/0.64  % Resolvents computed: 162
% 0.47/0.64  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.47/0.64  % Forward subsumed   : 0
% 0.47/0.64  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.47/0.64  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.47/0.64  % User time          : 0.265 s
% 0.47/0.64  % System time        : 0.017 s
% 0.47/0.64  % Total time         : 0.282 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------