%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SYN729-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:13:38 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.37s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN729-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 04:51:15 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.13/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.37 # % 0.13/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.37 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6 % 0.13/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.37 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 6 conjectures. % 0.13/0.37 # There are 6 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.37 # Found 1 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.13/0.37 # 6 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.37 # 5 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.37 # 1 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 6 % 0.13/0.37 # Returning from population with 14 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.37 # We now have 14 tableaux to operate on % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 % 0.13/0.37 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p(sk2))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~p(X1)|~l(sk2,X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p(sk1(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p(h(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (l(X1,g(h(sk1(X1))))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.37 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # Found 5 steps % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p(sk1(sk2))|~p(sk2)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~p(sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (p(sk1(sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (p(g(sk1(sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])). % 0.13/0.37 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (p(h(g(sk1(sk2))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_68, ...])). % 0.13/0.37 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.37 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p(sk2))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~p(X1)|~l(sk2,X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p(sk1(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p(h(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (l(X1,g(h(sk1(X1))))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # Found 4 steps % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p(sk2)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (p(sk2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (l(sk2,g(h(sk1(sk2))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (~p(g(h(sk1(sk2))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_62, ...])). % 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p(sk2))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~p(X1)|~l(sk2,X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p(sk1(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p(h(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (l(X1,g(h(sk1(X1))))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # Found 5 steps % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(sk2))|~p(sk2)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~p(sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (p(g(sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (p(sk1(g(sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (l(sk1(g(sk2)),g(h(sk1(sk1(g(sk2))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_64, ...])). % 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p(sk2))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~p(X1)|~l(sk2,X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p(sk1(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p(h(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (l(X1,g(h(sk1(X1))))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # Found 5 steps % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(sk2))|~p(sk2)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~p(sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (p(g(sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (p(g(g(sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (l(g(g(sk2)),g(h(sk1(g(g(sk2))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_64, ...])). % 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.38 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (p(sk2))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~p(X1)|~l(sk2,X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (p(sk1(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p(h(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (p(g(X1))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (l(X1,g(h(sk1(X1))))|~p(X1))). % 0.13/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.13/0.38 # Begin printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # Found 5 steps % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (p(h(sk2))|~p(sk2)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~p(sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_11])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (p(h(sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (p(sk1(h(sk2)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])). % 0.13/0.38 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (l(sk1(h(sk2)),g(h(sk1(sk1(h(sk2))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])). % 0.13/0.38 # End printing tableau % 0.13/0.38 # SZS output end % 0.13/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.13/0.38 # Child (29006) has found a proof. % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # Proof search is over... % 0.13/0.38 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------