%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : SYN730+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 05:40:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN730+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Tue May 5 08:45:31 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.62 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.62 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.25/1.62 fof(thm75, conjecture, ?[X1]:![X2]:?[X3]:((p(a,X2,h(X2))|p(X1,X2,k(X2)))=>p(X1,X2,X3)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm75)).
% 0.25/1.62 fof(i_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1]:![X2]:?[X3]:((p(a,X2,h(X2))|p(X1,X2,k(X2)))=>p(X1,X2,X3))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm75])).
% 0.25/1.62 fof(i_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X7, X9]:((p(a,esk1_1(X7),h(esk1_1(X7)))|p(X7,esk1_1(X7),k(esk1_1(X7))))&~p(X7,esk1_1(X7),X9)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[i_0_1])])])])])).
% 0.25/1.62 cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (p(a,esk1_1(X1),h(esk1_1(X1)))|p(X1,esk1_1(X1),k(esk1_1(X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.62 cnf(i_0_4, negated_conjecture, (~p(X1,esk1_1(X1),X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[i_0_2]), ['final']).
% 0.25/1.64 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (p(a,esk1_1(a),k(esk1_1(a)))), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0_4,i_0_3])).
% 0.25/1.64 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (~p(X1,esk1_1(X1),X2)), inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_4])).
% 0.25/1.64 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (p(a,esk1_1(X1),h(esk1_1(X1)))|p(X1,esk1_1(X1),k(esk1_1(X1)))), inference(rename_variables,[],[i_0_3])).
% 0.25/1.64 cnf(i_0_8,plain, ($false), inference(scs_inference,[],[i_0+4, i_0_5]), ['proof']).
% 0.25/1.64 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.25/1.64 % Total time : 1.270s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------