↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SYN730+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:10:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (   9   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   1 sgn  13   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm75,conjecture,
    ? [V] :
    ! [J] :
    ? [Q] :
      ( ( p(V,J,k(J))
        | p(a,J,h(J)) )
     => p(V,J,Q) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thm75) ).

fof(f_1_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [V] :
      ! [J] :
      ? [Q] :
        ( ( p(V,J,k(J))
          | p(a,J,h(J)) )
       => p(V,J,Q) ),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[thm75]) ).

fof(f_1_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [V] :
    ? [J] :
    ! [Q] :
      ( ~ p(V,J,Q)
      & ( p(V,J,k(J))
        | p(a,J,h(J)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[f_1_1]) ).

fof(f_1_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_2] :
    ? [U_1] :
    ! [U_0] :
      ( ~ p(U_2,U_1,U_0)
      & ( p(U_2,U_1,k(U_1))
        | p(a,U_1,h(U_1)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_1_2]) ).

fof(f_1_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_2] :
    ? [U_1] :
      ( ! [U_0] : ~ p(U_2,U_1,U_0)
      & ( p(U_2,U_1,k(U_1))
        | p(a,U_1,h(U_1)) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_1_3]) ).

fof(f_1_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [U_2] :
      ( ! [U_0] : ~ p(U_2,sK1(U_2),U_0)
      & ( p(U_2,sK1(U_2),k(sK1(U_2)))
        | p(a,sK1(U_2),h(sK1(U_2))) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(U_1,sK1(U_2))],[f_1_4]) ).

fof(f_1_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ! [U_0,U_2] : ~ p(U_2,sK1(U_2),U_0)
    & ! [U_2] :
        ( p(U_2,sK1(U_2),k(sK1(U_2)))
        | p(a,sK1(U_2),h(sK1(U_2))) ) ),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_1_5]) ).

cnf(f_1_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(U_2,sK1(U_2),k(sK1(U_2)))
    | p(a,sK1(U_2),h(sK1(U_2))) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(f_1_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(U_2,sK1(U_2),U_0),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_1_6]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ p(a,sK1(a),k(sK1(a))),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( p(a,sK1(a),h(sK1(a)))
    | p(a,sK1(a),k(sK1(a))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_1_7]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ~ p(a,sK1(a),h(sK1(a))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_1_8]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN730+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 07:08:24 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------