↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SYN730+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:08:03 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.54s 3.75s
% Output   : Proof 3.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : SYN730+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 15:10:08 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.54/3.75  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.54/3.75  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun V => ∀ (J : Iota), Exists fun Q => Or (p a J (h J)) (p V J (k J)) → p V J Q)) True
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (Exists fun V => ∀ (J : Iota), Exists fun Q => Or (p a J (h J)) (p V J (k J)) → p V J Q) False
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (J : Iota), Exists fun Q => Or (p a J (h J)) (p a_1 J (k J)) → p a_1 J Q) False
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.54/3.75    Eq
% 3.54/3.75      (Not
% 3.54/3.75        (Exists fun Q =>
% 3.54/3.75          Or (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) (p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) →
% 3.54/3.75            p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) Q))
% 3.54/3.75      True
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.54/3.75    Eq
% 3.54/3.75      (Exists fun Q =>
% 3.54/3.75        Or (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) (p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) →
% 3.54/3.75          p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) Q)
% 3.54/3.75      False
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.54/3.75    Eq
% 3.54/3.75      (Or (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) (p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) →
% 3.54/3.75        p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) a_3)
% 3.54/3.75      False
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.54/3.75    Eq (Or (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) (p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)))) True
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (p a (skS.0 0 a a_1) a_2) False
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.54/3.75    Or (Eq (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) True) (Eq (p a_1 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) True)
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #9 (by superposition #[7, 8]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (p a (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2) (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) True
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #12 (by superposition #[10, 7]): Eq True False
% 3.54/3.75  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): False
% 3.54/3.75  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------